Re: Feedburner vs Wordpress

  • From: "Brent Harding" <bharding@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:56:57 -0600

I say dump it. If they ever went out of business, you'd have to republish everything in the directories. If you run it on your site, you don't have to worry about stuff like that.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Holmes" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <blindcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Feedburner vs Wordpress

Hash: RIPEMD160

I'm curious about something.  Since I switched my blog stuff over to
Wordpress, I now have a full RSS 2.0 feed including audio enclosures
available directly from my local site.  But I've been using feedburner
from before and it is still compatible with my new RSS feed.  My
question is, how bout if I dump feedburner and just publish my RSS feed
directly? I haven't joined any directories yet and plan to after making
this decision.  After tweaking things in Wordpress, I noticed the
addresses to my RSS feeds (blog and comments) became quite simple
actually; they started out more complex but some how defaulted down to
something pretty easy to give out.  So, what you-all think? should I
keep feedburner or go ahead and dump it and just go with my local RSS

Thanks for ideas and any answers you might come up with.

- -- HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)


Other related posts: