We shall see I guess. -----Original Message----- From: blind_html-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:blind_html-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nimer Jaber Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 2:52 PM To: blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: blind_html Re: Fwd: What say you? I agree, I am not sure though if the agenda of Obama supports this. Thanks Nimer J On 13/04/09 15:48, Sarah Alawami wrote: > I think that the president should be one of us, a leader, a teacher, a > person who makes mistakes and does not get chastised for them, a > person who is a self starter and who is willing to research and is not > afraid to ask questions if need be. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > *From:* blind_html-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:blind_html-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Nimer Jaber > *Sent:* Monday, April 13, 2009 12:13 PM > *To:* blind_html@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* blind_html Fwd: What say you? > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: What say you? > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:39:12 -0700 > From: Edwin Cooney <edwincooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <edwincooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi All, > Do you have in your mind an image of the ideal President of the United > States? Did you once have one but have found that time has blurred or > obscured it? If so, why? Have you changed? Has America sufficiently > changed thus bringing this mental distortion about? > I confess that my image of an American president is that of a leader > and teacher, much like the one described in early 1961 by the late > Senator William J. Fullbright of Arkansas. He described our president > (supposedly young Jack Kennedy) as being our teacher and moral leader. > (I'm sure you can find the full quotation somewhere on google.) It > just seems to me that leadership invariably involves teaching. It > requires the teacher him or herself to be learning through observation > and analysis and passing on that information to you and to me. > Thus what's below. Your assignment, whether or not you ever turn in > your homework, is to decide for yourself whether there is or should be > an ideal presidential image. Has there always been and should their > always be? Can it be avoided? If it's real because American citizens > and people of other lands have one, how in your view does it effect > our ability to get along in the world? > Here's hoping that you'll enjoy what's below and consider doing your > homeowrk assignment. Teacher will be waiting! > Thanks for reading and considering what's below. I'm grateful for the > time you take to do it. > Warm Regards, > E.C. > > MONDAY APRIL 13^TH , 2009 > > THE PRESIDENT'S IMAGE > > BY EDWIN COONEY > > Just a few days ago, one of my readers sent me an interesting little > article about President Obama's television watching habits. The > president appears to be such a big SportsCenter fan -- favoring both > college and professional basketball -- that he avoids the 24/7 news > cycles. He never listens or watches reruns of his own news > conferences, town hall meetings or speeches. Thus, one gets the idea > that President Barack Hussein Obama is just a regular guy. > > It's often observed that modern Republicans prefer the presidential > image of a Commander-In-Chief on foreign policy issues and a > business-oriented Chief Executive Officer on domestic matters. Their > memory of President Ronald Reagan's dignified eloquence and idealism > makes him the GOP's modern presidential role model with additional > kudos to Ike, Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. > > Democrats, on the other hand, are said to favor a "Philosopher King", > someone with just enough majesty to guide the people without appearing > "above" them. FDR and Truman are the modern Democratic role models - > different as they were. > > Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harvard-educated, possessed a Brahmin accent. > Nevertheless, he spoke plainly and directly to the American people > beginning that Sunday night of March 12^th 1933. He sat behind radio > microphones and addressed the people from the Diplomatic Reception > Room of the White House. His topic was the purpose and scope of the > bank holiday. FDR's mostly Sunday night talks came to be known as > Fireside chats. On the other hand, Harry Truman--short, trim and gray > with wire-rimmed spectacles-spoke with a combined Southern and > Midwestern accent. He addressed his country's foreign and domestic > crises with his words often coming forth in a staccato rhythm. > > In 2000 and again in 2004, George W. Bush was the people's choice over > the "wooden" Al Gore and the "rigid and aloof" John Kerry because he > was "the kind of guy with whom anyone would enjoy sharing a beer". > So, because we more readily identified with the image created by the > plainspoken Texan, we chose him as our leader. He was one of us. > > Thus, as we approach the third month of a new presidency, the question > is what is President Obama's overall image? He has just returned from > his first trip abroad where he apparently impressed his G-20 heads of > state brethren, wowed the intellectuals and media of Europe, and > assured the Turks that Americans would never go to war against Islam. > He reassured our troops in Iraq that he appreciated them for all of > their accomplishments--insisting that a grateful nation owed them much > in the way of education and health care--and told them that their > Iraqi service time would soon be over. > > Conservatives insist that President Obama is everything from a Marxist > to an Islamic-Fascist. Liberals and Progressives, for the most part > (but with some exceptions on the part of populists who fear assistance > to corporations), still consider the president as having the makings > of a political messiah. > > As for this observer, I like him for his steadiness, his capacity for > flexibility and for his overall outlook. I like his assertion that > even with all of the vexing problems a president faces (such as AIG > executive over-compensation, North Korean aggravation), he can't > afford to govern from anger. > > Even more, President Obama seems to operate from understanding rather > than judgment. Unlike his predecessor he doesn't confuse approval of > an individual head of state or system of government with legitimacy. > He seems to comprehend that behavior rather than propaganda or even > outlook is what all governments, ours included, should be judged on. > > His critics will continue to paint him as an elitist, a spendthrift > and a socialist -- and that will be the kind things they say! His > supporters, for the most part, will cut him slack offering the benefit > of the doubt, softer criticism for his inevitable mistakes and praise > for his successes. Both of these perspectives, as Jimmy Carter used to > point out, "go with the territory' of the presidency. > > Some of us, who invariably enjoy linking baseball to American > political life (as well as with life in general), might get some > perspective out of the following: A number of years ago, there was an > infielder for the San Francisco Giants who boasted that he had seven > given names. They > were: Alan Michael Edward George Patrick Henry Gallagher. (He was also > called "Dirty Al Gallagher-but we can generously put that aside.) > > Hence, my ideal presidential image is: Abraham Teddy Delano Kennedy > Carter Reagan Obama. How's that for inter-political presidential image > breeding?! > > RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, > > EDWIN COONEY > > blind_html > To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to > blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the subject line. > To access the archives, please visit: > //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html > > Thanks > blind_html To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the subject line. To access the archives, please visit: //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html Thanks blind_html To unsubscribe, please send a blank email to blind_html-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the subject line. To access the archives, please visit: //www.freelists.org/archive/blind_html Thanks