-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Public Servants (Parliament) and Private lives / Also - Subject of Legalizing Suicide Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:19:39 -0700 (PDT) From: David Jeffrey Spetch <beyond_ultimate@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: Politics & Current Events <politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Public Servants (Parliament) and Private lives / Also - Subject of Legalizing Suicide Ok I'll begin with the subject of legalizing suicide / Euthanization. Lets say it has been made legal as long as you sign documentation of consent. Well someone puts a gun to your head and says sign this paper of Euthanization consent. Of course they get away with murder but since you signed the document and it is legal murderers get away with murder. Of course it is too late to bring up in a court of law that you had a gun to your head and how is anyone ever to know the wiser. Oh and lets say this presumed consent of organ donation becomes legal, not only are you murdering people, your selling their organs and making money from it. Is society really that blind to even ponder such ... I find it pathetic that I seem to be stuck on a globe full of idiots, but I do care which is why I do what I do. Ok secondly I'll address the issue of public servants and private lives. When people / general public vote for representatives of parliament they are not voting for the most dedicated spouse of the year, or Ms. or Mr. congeniality, parent of the year or or even role model of the year. That is right when people vote, the issue obviously is what the candidates propose to bring to the table to effectively do their job as a vote winner / Member of Parliament on Federal or Provincial levels or even City Council. But hey to no surprise the media seeks to increase public interest by desperately scrambling to make what is into what they would rather it be to obviously suit their own selfish motives and in this case it is obviously blubbering for attention by making anything the issue that leads to public confusion or hype to sell their magazines, news papers, radio / television broadcasts etc. If someone that no one has even heard of or even has a resume runs for office and they champion their campaign with flying colours which leads to victory then it is only a matter of time before how effective they do their job is revealed and if they do their job exceptionally well then it obviously does not matter what they do with their own personal life. If they get carried away then we have laws to be enforced and if anyone is behind bars then they obviously can no longer be effective period. If a person gets voted into office and kicks butt generating jobs, increasing the economy, reducing crime or corruption for us all etc. (for example) then why is it even a question that because they cheated on their spouse puts their job in jeopardy? Oh ok, I see those within the media or run media venues want to see people in office that are not effective as long as they don't cheat on their spouse, as long as they do not smoke pot etc. I find it pathetic that I seem to be stuck on a globe full of selfish greedy life bashers who's main concern is making revenue for their business of exploitation of private lives over having concern for the abilities of what these people voted in bring to the table, but I care which is why I do what I do. Well out of time once again, hope you enjoyed the read. David Jeffrey Spetch Ps. Be good, be strong! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politics & Current Events" group. To post to this group, send email to politics-current-events@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send email to politics-current-events+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/politics-current-events?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- -- Posted By Nimer Jaber to Nimer's Political Blog at 8/06/2009 12:48:00 AM