My apologies (she said shamefacedly). You're absolutely correct. I
kept thinking it was Jan. 8 instead of 10th--and even then it would
only have been a week and a half.
Cindy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jabrown@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:47:54 -0600
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: your book has not been accepted
>
> Hello Bud,
>
> Yes, the duplicate submission was the reason. You accidentally submitted
> two
> copies to the system and so I rejected one of them in an attempt to make
> sure that two different people didn't end up doing duplicate work on the
> book. The latest data we have which is about ONE week old shows a
> volunteer
> is working on the other copy.
>
> Jake
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bud Schwab" <budschwab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 5:43 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: your book has not been accepted
>
>
>> Hi Gerald,
>>
>> At the bottom of my rejection it said a possible cause could be
>> duplicate
>> copy but that didn't seem very deffinite. I notice there is another
>> book
>> by the same author called Sullivan's Law so I thought it got confused
>> with
>> that. How could I find if it's out for validation?
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Bud
>>
>> At 02:41 PM 1/18/2007, you wrote:
> >>Bud,
>>>
> >>I think Jake mentioned that he rejected your book because you
> accidentally
> >>submitted two copies. The other copy should still be out for
> validation.
> >>Take another look at the e-mail you received to see if there's a
> reason,
> >>because Jake always puts a note in the comments.
>>>
> >>HTH
>>>
> >>Gerald
>>>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bud Schwab
> >>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:39 PM
> >>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] your book has not been accepted
>>>
> >>Hi Gang,
>>>
> >>Well, back to my old complaint, when a book has ben rejected why aren't
> we
> >>told why so we can learn by it? I just got a rejection notice on
> >>Sullivan's
> >>Evidence by Nancy Taylor Rosenberg. It says the validator gave no
> reason
> >>why it was not accepted. Is anybody here the one who rejected it and
> >>could
> >>you tell me why. I checked again and it isn't a duplication so I'm
> >>baffled
> >>Who can I contact to find out the reason?
> >>Thanks..
>>>
>>>
> >>Bud Schwab
> >>W 6 Z Y P
> >>Malibu, California
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> >>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
> list
> >>of
> >>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> >>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
> list
> >>of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
> line.
>>
>>
>> Bud Schwab
>> W 6 Z Y P
>> Malibu, California
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
>> line.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Date:
>> 1/18/2007
>> 4:00 AM
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
