Sorry to say this, but there really isn't any other choice. If you put a file on your braille note without converting it to braille you will need to write and edit that document in computer braille. If you converted the file to braille you could edit in grade II, but when you converted it back to text there is very likely to be translation errors. I cann't tell you that doing that would be illegal or anything, but it would be inadvisable. :-) Sarah Van Oosterwijck curious entity at earthlink dot net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 12:49 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: working in keyword format rather than .rtf > The book I validated was in RTF format; I worked with it on the BrailleNote > without changing the format but found I had to be in computer braille to > make any corrections. Has this been your experience. This was a > comparatively short book, but I'm not willing to edit in computer braille > for a longer book. Have you found any way around this? Jill > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:54 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] working in keyword format rather than .rtf > > > > > > Braillenote may well have more crashes and file truncations in .rtf format > > than in its native format. However, the keyword format does change the > > book and the more you go from one format to another the more the file is > > changed or so I gather. So I leave it in its original .rtf file format by > > answering no when I hit space e to save. Just do a lot of backup copies > to > > a second directory is about all I can add. Good luck. We really need > > patience to work this one out. I do wish the PDI folks were more diligent > > about tracking down the tendency the BN has to wreck files. > > > > E. > > > > > > > > >