Me, too, Lisa. Since I'm sighted, I don't feel I have the right to ask for anything to be scanned. And I might scan some myself, but I feel I should be concentrating on validating. I especially wish someone would scan Skye O'Malley, because that's the first of two series -- sagas, that include some of the books -- Darling Jasmine, Besieged, one other -- that are already on the list. I can read the books, but I feel guilty doing that without scanning them and making them available to bookshare (I have cheated though and read a couple of others, no part of the saga; I recently read Kadin, which I thoroughly enjoyed and which had no erotic descriptions at all). I had to read that after the references to the Earl of Glenkirk and his daughter Janet in Until You. There's supposedly a third in that series coming out in October. I assume it's about Rosamund's daughter. Cindy --- Original Message ----- From: "Lisa Leonardi" <lml5280@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:47:24 -0500 To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: unsatisfactory synopses > Speaking of Bertrice Small, if any of you scanners out there have access > to any of her books that are not in the bookshare collection, would you mind > submitting some? I love her novels but there are only six within the > collection (and I read those off in just over a week, smile). If anyone can > submit them, I'd really appreciate. (So much, in fact, I'd validate all of > them.) > > Lisa > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:32 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: unsatisfactory synopses > > > > Natalie, the validator absolutely should *not* have > > taken out your synopsis and put in only romance. Much > > more is needed. There is so much variety to romance > > novels -- are they historical romances or modern? Is > > there sex, either explicit and raw (which I don't care > > for) or delicately and erotically written, like > > Bertrice Small's,which I love? Is the romance the main > > part of the plot or very tangential, as in A Woman > > Betrayed, which I don't consider to be primarily a > > romance but apparently the scanner did. > > > > Keep putting them in, and hopefully your scanned books > > will be validated by someone who's more careful. I'm > > about to validate a book that already has excellent > > synopses and I don't have to worry about that part of > > it. > > > > Cindy > > > > -- Lemina <lemina007@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi to all, > > > > > > I finally got back on the list. I think I was lot > > > for a bit. > > > > > > Anyway, I saw these posts about unsatisfactory > > > synopsis's and I just had to > > > post a comment. Since, as I said, I haven't been > > > receveing all the other > > > mails from a while back to up until a few days ago, > > > I dont' know if this > > > subject was brought up and discussed, nd closed. I > > > know it was brought up > > > once before, but I wanted to put my own two cents in > > > it. > > > > > > A while back I submitted several books in the > > > romance category. Now, when I > > > submit a scanned book, I always, always put in the > > > long synopsis box the > > > exact stuff that comes from the back of the book. > > > And from there I put a > > > edited version of the long synopsis in the short > > > synopsis box. > > > So, a while back I got an e-mail saying that one of > > > my submitted books was > > > validated and accepted into the collection. I was > > > like, yay! > > > Then, a little while after that, I was searching > > > through the romance > > > category, looking for books to read, when I came > > > across that book I > > > submitted. And whoever validated my book totally > > > deleted my short and long > > > synopsis and just put "romance." I cannot tell you > > > how confused and > > > mystified I was by this. I don't know about the rest > > > of you, but I enjoy > > > reading the short and long synopsis's that people > > > put on their submitted > > > books. I don't go by author or title, but what the > > > book is about. I like to > > > know before I read the book a bit about what the > > > storyline is. So, going by > > > my own preference, I'm confused as to why someone > > > would delete what the book > > > was about and just put the word romance. > > > > > > And that's something I've noticed a lot about the > > > romance category. Don't > > > know about other categories, but in the romance > > > category, if you scroll > > > through the books, a lot of books just say, > > > "romance" or "romance by best > > > selling author." I'm just trying to better > > > understand why this is done. Is > > > it a lack of time by the volunteeer to find a > > > synopsis or scan the back of > > > the book? Or is it a preference, perhaps? > > > > > > If anyone can answer my questions to help me better > > > understand, I would > > > appreciate it. :) > > > > > > Natalie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > > http://vote.yahoo.c > -- _______________________________________________ Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10