[bksvol-discuss] Re: text quality
- From: "Rui Cabral" <rui@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:26:54 -0400
Hi Kellie and all:
Yes Kellie, I do like this concept.
But the main thing behind all 3 lists that i propose to host on the
Unofficial Bookshare Volunteer Website is, the data.
I need Volunteers to e-mail Booksharescans@xxxxxxx with any of the
following.
1. Books Volunteers plan to scan.
2. Books that vallidators have rejected (your name won't be posted on this
list)
or 3. Books of shall we say "marginal quality" that you feel should be
rescanned.
I feel if everyone participates this may really have a positive impact.
Otherwise if only a few people E-mail, then it is an opportunity wasted.
E-mail me your thoughts at booksharescans@xxxxxxx
--Rui
http://members.cox.net/booksharescans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: text quality
> Hi Rui,
> Keeping a list of books that have been rejected isn't a bad idea. I have
> another similar idea and I wonder if you'd be interested. I think it would
> be a good idea if there was somewhere to post a list of books in the
> collection that could use substantial improvement, possibly rescanning.
I've
> come across such books in the collection; some I requested rejecting, but
> others weren't quite bad enough for that.
> What do you and the rest of the list gang think?
> Kellie
>
>
>
Other related posts:
