[bksvol-discuss] Re: submitted 36 books today
- From: "Jake Brownell" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:13:09 -0500
Hey Kellie,
I would definately have to agree. My point was that the BookShare site
*still* encourages the submission of ARK and KES files as the preferred file
format if possible. I know there are definately limited time constraints/people
involved in the BookShare iniative and I thank each and every one of them, but
I'd like to see this issue addressed so that future volunteers are lead astray.
Jake
----- Original Message -----
From: Kellie Hartmann
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 3:01 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: submitted 36 books today
Hi Jake and Kaitlyn,
Originally we were encouraged to submit the arc and kes files with their
images, but then practical considerations interfered. Thos files with images
included are very huge, and not many people can validate them because they are
in proprietary formats, and because they're so large. So now the general
consensus is that rtf is best because it's inclusive and smaller than the big
images. There's still nothing wrong with submitting arcs and kes files, but it
may take 16 forevers for them to get validated.
Kellie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.16 - Release Date: 5/24/2005
Other related posts:
