[bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page

Hello again:
That happened to me once as well. Admittedly not for such a long period of
time, but hey.
It depends entirely why the book is being sent back to begin with.

-- Rui (the wanna be Bookshare Engineer)
 Bookshare.org Unofficial Volunteer Scanning Page
http://members.cox.net/booksharescans

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page


>
> Hi Rui,
>
> This isn't hate mail but I imagine that remark made others besides me
laugh.
> What about this??  David Talmage has had one validation that has been
> bouncing for two months.  If you were a Bookshare engineer what would you
do
> about that?  <lol>  I can ask because I haven't agreed or disagreed in
this
> particular discussion.
>
> Sue Stevens
>
> All hate mail will bounce.  <lol>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rui Cabral" <rui@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:54 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page
>
>
> Hi Everyone:
> I am about to disagree with all of you.
> If I was a bookshare engineer, I would design the system to bounce back
the
> original submissions not the edited ones on the step 1 page.
> I basically take the "all or nothing approach."
> if i validate a book, and i screw up (yes it has happened) it should go
back
> to square 1 to someone else.
> Now if i see that it bounced back, I can upload my saved copy and make the
> changes that have been requested.
>
> So I like the current procedure.
>
>  Rui's bookshare golden rule: Always keep a saved copy until a book is in
> the collection
>
>
> -- Rui(hate mail can be sent to rui@xxxxxxxx
>  Bookshare.org Unofficial Volunteer Scanning Page
> http://members.cox.net/booksharescans
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Julie Morales
>   To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 7:30 PM
>   Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page
>
>
>   Hi, Marissa. I know this is beyond your control, but would it not be
> possible, when a book has to be bounced back, to at least keep the
validated
> version intact so all the editing that did take place isn't lost? This has
> never happened to me, but I know it has to be frustrating for those to
whom
> it does happen. Take care.
>   Julie Morales
>   Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
>   inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   When God puts a tear in your eye, it is because He wants to put a
rainbow
> in your heart.
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Marissa Mika
>     To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:42 AM
>     Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page
>
>
>     Hi Tiffany,
>
>
>
>     You are correct. When the books are bounced back to the validation
cue,
> it is the original copy of the file. I don't particularly like this
policy,
> but it's essentially beyond my control to change it at present. So you
don't
> lose your validation work or credit, I suggest keeping a saved copy of the
> books you validate on your hard-drive until you get the official approval
> notice.
>
>
>
>     I know it would be ideal if a note could be sent out when a book
bounces
> back to the approval cue. I'll talk to the engineers and see what we can
do.
>
>
>
>     Best,
>
>     Marissa
>
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tiffany H.
Jessen
>     Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:26 AM
>     To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Subject: [bksvol-discuss] returned to step one page
>
>
>
>     Hello.
>
>     On the step one page tonight, I found a few books which have already
> been validated and approved, but they say they were bounced back to the
step
> one page for different reasons, checking page breaks, copyright
information,
> etc.
>
>     My question is, when it's bounced back to the step one page, is that
> copy the original file again, or the already validated once cleaned-up
copy?
>
>     I would really hope it to be the second, but they're appearing back in
> their original formats, so I'm left to assume the second.
>
>     Tiffany
>
>
>
>
>
>


Other related posts: