[bksvol-discuss] Re: rejected two books.
- From: "Gary Petraccaro" <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 07:20:25 -0400
That's why I try to let prospective proofers know what I did and didn't do with
a particular book.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:59 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: rejected two books.
Not only can but should. The days when Bookshare wanted scans, no matter of
what quality, are gone. and in my opinion,, the burden of finding missing words
shouldn't be placed on the proofreader. The scanner should read the book he
scans.
----- Original Message -----
From: robert tweedy
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 8:02 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] rejected two books.
I rejected two books marked for murder and silent protector. These books
where held for someone else but that person had their name taken off. The
submitter didn't hold down the book firmly and didn't leave their email address
so I have always thought this and maybe I am wrong but a lot of proof readers
don't have time to get a book where there is junk on every page where the
submitter didn't hold down the book so why proof readers take their time to
clean up the books? Yes we need to do that too but the submitters can do it too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3052 - Release Date: 08/05/10
06:35:00
Other related posts:
