Rui, It may mean I submit less books to Bookshare but I'd rather they are readable! Have several questions - am unsure as to whom they should be addressed but I'll ask them anyway. Let's say I download a book from Bookshare which has been accepted. Besides rescanning it, which I would prefer to leave to someone else, if I find errors (it may be rated good or fair), and wish to correct them, is there a way the book can be resubmitted again? If so, what would the procedure be? Thanks in advance and hope this makes sense. Have a great weekend everyone and happy reading, scanning, validating or whatever else you may be doing! SL -----Original Message----- .From: "Rui Cabral"<rui@xxxxxxxx> .Sent: 8/27/04 5:47:39 PM .To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: quality . .Hi Susan: .Don't worry, you and David aren't alone. There are many of us here who want .the collection to be of high quality. . . . . .----- Original Message ----- .From: "Susan Lumpkin" <slumpkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> .To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> .Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 6:43 PM .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to Reject!! . . .> David, I do the same and it's nice to know someone else does as well. Have .a good weekend. .> .> -----Original Message----- .> .From: "David"<davidc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> .> .Sent: 8/27/04 3:35:20 PM .> .To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> .> .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: When to Reject!! .> . .> .I guess I am a little insane. I actually use a spell checker on the books .> .which I am validating and do my best to bring them up to excellent .quality. .> . .> .David .> . .> . .> .-----Original Message----- .> .From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx .> .[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Pietruk .> .Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:53 AM .> .To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx .> .Subject: [bksvol-discuss] When to Reject!! .> . .> . .> .I am now validating a novel on which I have to decide whether the text is .> .readable enough or not. The book is all there, I can follow the story, .> .but there are a lot of words scrambled and missing. Where does one draw .> .the line between accepting it as a fair book or canning it? .> .It has been sitting in the pool for a couple of months with no one .> .touching it. The book is scanned by a frequent contributor though this .> .particular book doesn't come up to what has been done by this individual .> .in the past. .> . .> .I could easily return it to the pool; but this likely would place the .book .> .in limbo for who knows how long? .> . .> .So, how poor does fair text have to be to be bad text? .> . .> . .> .--- .> .Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. .> .Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). .> .Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 - Release Date: 8/24/2004 .> . .> . .> .--- .> .Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. .> .Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). .> .Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 - Release Date: 8/24/2004 .> . .> . .> . .> .> .> . .