[bksvol-discuss] Re: proofreading questions

  • From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:18:04 -0700 (PDT)

I wonder if it's necessary to re-place that apostrophe that is over the 
penultimate letter rather than after it, where it belongs. That is something 
someone who listens or uses Braille to rad will have to say; to a sighted 
person it's very clear what it is.
Cindy



--- On Thu, 7/26/12, Judy s. <cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Judy s. <cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: proofreading questions
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, July 26, 2012, 6:03 PM


  
    
  
  
    Hi John,

    

    I can answer the bit about books.google.com. It's unlikely that you
    would want to change your page breaks in the  scanned version .rtf
    to match the Google copy.  Your edition is probably a totally
    different edition than the one that is on google books.  I run into
    this all the time. Books can have 20 or 30 different editions, or
    even more, and the pagination will be different on each edition.

    

    The missing dash problem could have from a whole bunch of causes.  I
    don't have a fix for you as a proofreader to handle that easily,
    unless there is a specific consistent pattern you can use to do a
    'search and replace' for the missing em dashes. One idea from the
    pattern you are seeing  is to just do a search for space space and
    then replace each of these that appear to be a missing em dash with
    a hyphen hypen, Someone else here may have a better idea, though.

    

    I'm also a sighted volunteer with limitations that don't allow me to
    manipulate a print book. There are a few of us in that boat that are
    volunteers here.  I use google book and amazon peek both when
    available, and when I can't get an answer I need there or from the
    person who scanned the book I ask on the list if someone can find
    the book and scan the page and send it to me.

    

    Hope that helps,

    

    Judy s.

    

    On 7/26/2012 7:06 PM, John Simpson
      wrote:

    
    
      
      
      


      
           
        I have several questions about the book that I am
              currently proofing.
              First off, words that are followed by an "'s" have the
              apostrsphe
              over the penultimate letter (e.g. Martin̓s). While this is
              not a showstopper,
              it does require a fair amount of corrections. I guess my
              question is what
              causes this kind of construction? Is it a function of the
              scan volunteer, the
              scanner hardware, or the OCR software?  
           
        Secondly, I have gone to books.google.com to take
              a look at this book.
              My question here is whether Google has a fair
              representation of the book. I
              know that all but one page are present, but within the
              first several chapters,
              the page breaks in the scanned version .rtf are not in the
              same place as they
              are in Google's copy. I certainly don't want to have to go
              through the entire
              book changing pagination based on Google. I do have a hold
              at my local library
              for the print copy that will help answer this question.
              Any other advice would
              be greatly appreciated. 
           
        The third question is that in the scanned version
              that I have from
              BookShare there are frequent instances of two spaces,
              rather than one. The
              sense of the book is that there should be a comma where
              the first space is.
              However, when looking at the Google version, this
              separator is an m dash
              surrounded by spaces.  All of these dashes have been
              removed. Again, my
              question is whether this is a function of the scan
              volunteer the scanner
              hardware or the OCR software. Again, I do not wish to go
              through the entire
              print book looking for dashes that I need to replace, or
              even to do a find on
              two spaces and see if the meeting indicates a dash. 
           
        I am a sighted volunteer with physical limitations
              that do not allow me
              to manipulate a print book. While I don't mind getting
              occasional assistance to
              go to a specific page to verify my proofreading, I'm not
              able to scan a print
              book and compare my scan to the BookShare .rtf version. 
              If the Google
              representation is accurate relative to the print book, I
              will be happy to use that
              as a resource wherever possible. 
           
        Thanks for any and all suggestions. 
           
        John Simpson 
           
           
      
    
    

    

  


 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: