[bksvol-discuss] Re: plesure reading quality&quality standards
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:44:20 -0600
What it says in the validation instructions is rating of errors as
excellent, good or fair. That means, and says, word recognition errors
which means scanning errors. Scanners do misinterpret words sometimees, but
what poor quality means is that the book could not be corrected by the
validator because there was so much missing, or so many places where the
errors were undecipherable that the validator was unable to correct them and
has to reject the book. It has nothing to do with the book itself. A lot
of us enjoy light romances.
Sue
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gisela Vazquez" <gvazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] plesure reading quality&quality standards
Someone clearly stated that if it was light reading,
like romance, quality was not as important. I for one enjoy reading romance
and feel that I still deserve quality.
I may have missed that post but I don't believe that plesure reading should
nor will be relegated to lower quality standards. The question is what is
meant by quality? What should be looked at to decide that question from most
to least importants.
Gisela
Other related posts:
