Rachel, I being a quality radical, would have rejected it. My rationale is that as we have now almost 20,000 titles in the collection, we should consider that paying customers deserve quality as much as quantity. Guido Guido D. Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html "Rachel" <rherold@xxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/22/2004 02:25 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] newbie question hello all, I just validated Christopher Stasheff's A Wizard in Midgard. I cleaned it up quite a bit but there were places where half a sentence was just plain missing. Or where the line of gibberish wasn't decipherable. Overall, the story was quite readable when I got thru with it but the occasional missing half of a sentence or missing sentence might be rather annoying. I rated the quality as poor but accepted my edited version. Is this what you all would have done? Thanks, Rachel Herold rherold@xxxxxxx