Kelly, this slight higher than real number of 'fair' in submission rating is essentially a system implementation limitation. I suggest that any future enhancement to the book submission system does completely away with the quality index combo box. Rather, the file submittet should go through the same automated quality assessment used for the post review submission, where the system assigns a quality rating and the submitter has the opprtunity to override this down/up. In a similar way the adult checkbox should also be moved to an immediate post-upload panel, where the submitter has instead the opportunity to override a system-generated evaluation. This is yet another suggestion for marissa to add to her reqs log book! Guido Guido Guido Dante Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. Research Division, Phone: 512. 838. 9735. Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.ibm.com/able "Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/30/2004 01:44 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] much better than fair Hi all, I just uploaded a book yesterday about Hong Kong. It had been marked fair, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that this book could have been marked excellent. There were very few errors, and the few errors were not the kind that would interfere with reading the book. This book was submitted by one of our prolific submitters whose books I hadn't happened to work on before, so it was really encouraging to see how good this scan was. Spellcheckers might not have liked this book because it was written with British spellings and there were lots of Chinese names of people, but even these names came out with no problems. I can't speak Chinese, but the names looked good and were names like the ones from my East Asian history classes--I didn't find anyone named Q3^* or anything. <grin> Kellie