[bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:15:34 -0600
Kelly, this slight higher than real number of 'fair' in submission rating
is essentially a system implementation limitation. I suggest that any
future enhancement to the book submission system does completely away with
the quality index combo box. Rather, the file submittet should go
through the same automated quality assessment used for the post review
submission, where the system assigns a quality rating and the submitter
has the opprtunity to override this down/up. In a similar way the adult
checkbox should also be moved to an immediate post-upload panel, where
the submitter has instead the opportunity to override a system-generated
evaluation.
This is yet another suggestion for marissa to add to her reqs log book!
Guido
Guido
Guido Dante Corona
IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx.
Research Division,
Phone: 512. 838. 9735.
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.ibm.com/able
"Kellie Hartmann" <kellhart@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12/30/2004 01:44 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss
To
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] much better than fair
Hi all,
I just uploaded a book yesterday about Hong Kong. It had been marked fair,
but I was pleasantly surprised to find that this book could have been
marked
excellent. There were very few errors, and the few errors were not the
kind
that would interfere with reading the book. This book was submitted by one
of our prolific submitters whose books I hadn't happened to work on
before,
so it was really encouraging to see how good this scan was. Spellcheckers
might not have liked this book because it was written with British
spellings
and there were lots of Chinese names of people, but even these names came
out with no problems. I can't speak Chinese, but the names looked good and
were names like the ones from my East Asian history classes--I didn't find
anyone named Q3^* or anything. <grin>
Kellie
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Kellie Hartmann
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Mike Pietruk
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] much better than fair
- From: Kellie Hartmann
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Kellie Hartmann
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: much better than fair -- A new feature suggestion
- From: Mike Pietruk
- [bksvol-discuss] much better than fair
- From: Kellie Hartmann