[bksvol-discuss] Re: footnotes
- From: Mayrie ReNae <mrenae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:09:06 -0700
Hi Devorah,
You are doing exactly what I would
do. Just my two cents. Thanks for all of your
help! And everyone else's hard work too! Can't
have anyone feeling as though volunteering goes unnoticed!
Peace,
Mayrie
At 05:05 PM 3/26/2008, you wrote:
Hi you all,
The last time I asked a question it was about
bullets. Well, the book I had downloaded looked
like it had a lot of bullets at first glance. It
is from 1963. It?s a classic, though, Stigma, by
Erving Goffman and although the language is
dated, he still has a lot of good stuff to say,
so I thought I would take a copy of the
paperback out of the library and go through the
book carefully. Today the paperback arrived at
my library. I brought it home. The bullets in
the scanned book turned out to be footnotes.
Teeny tiny little numbers which scanned as
bullets, asterisks, and other weird symbols.
It makes sense to me to just have footnote
numbers the same size as the regular text, but I
thought I should ask. I?m on Chapter 1 and
already up to footnote 67. So for example here?s
a fragment. It?s footnote 67 and I just have it
in the middle of the text. Is this correct?
There are a gazillion footnotes and before I do
any more I thought best to ask. The ellipses
before and after are mine, stuck in to indicate it?s a fragment out of context.
?teasing, ostracism, and fights.67 Interestingly, the more the child is?
Thanks,
Devorah
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
