[bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns?

  • From: "Merrill Louise" <STARBASEWILDGOOSE@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:22:39 -0400

And, to my way of thinking, being able to read a book is what counts. I think 
page numbers, footnotes, bibliographies, and even indexes have their place in a 
scholarly work, but it's the text that counts most.
Merrill Louise, Pastor
The Judson Fellowship
Jamestown, New York
cell/office 716.969.2840
"With all my heart   I praise the Lord, and I am glad because of God my Savior. 
(Luke 1:46-47) 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jana Jackson 
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns?


As I said, Guido, the important thing is that all of the text be included.  
Yes, all pages should be included.  However, if page numbers are not available, 
a book should not be trashed if the text quality is what it needs to be.  Until 
a member of the Bookshare staff says differently, I'm sorry, but those are the 
rules!

Jana

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Guido Corona 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:37 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns?



  Sorry,  there must be a 1 to 1 match between printed pages and etext pages.  
If pages are missing they should be integrated.  If there are duplicate pages 
extra copy must be removed.   
  If it is clear there is no 1 to 1 page correspondence,  at least for the 
body-text after all front matter, and nothing can be done about it,  the book 
should be trashed. 

  Let's keep quality up, folks! 

  Guido 


  Guido D. Corona
  IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
  IBM Research,
  Phone:  (512) 838-9735
  Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

  Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
  http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html




        "Jana Jackson" <jana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
        Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        08/19/2004 07:16 PM Please respond to
              bksvol-discuss 


       To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
              cc  
              Subject [bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns? 

              

       



  Hi, Rachael!  The main thing is to make sure that all of the text is there.  
If yyou have access to the book, you can re-scan pages to make the numbers 
match up if you want to.  Take care! 
    
  Jana 
    
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rachel 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:17 PM 
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns? 

  what about the page numbers not matching up then? 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Guido Corona 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:20 PM 
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: contents in columns? 


  In general you should scan with column recognition turned off and 
two-pages-per-scan turned on.  It may be faster to rescan the table of contents 
than to fix it. 

  Guido 


  Guido D. Corona
  IBM Accessibility Center,  Austin Tx.
  IBM Research,
  Phone:  (512) 838-9735
  Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx

  Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at:
  http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html



        "Rachel" <rherold@xxxxxxx> 
        Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        08/19/2004 07:02 PM 
              Please respond to
              bksvol-discuss 


       
              To <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
              cc  
              Subject [bksvol-discuss] contents in columns? 


              

       




  hello, i've only validated until now but thought i'd try a bit of scanning.
  The table of contents is in two columns, do I leave the information this way
  or do I put it on separate pages so it flows numerically?
  Ex:
  chapter 1        chapter 5
  1-1                 5-1
  1-2                 5-2
  etc                  etc

  OR

  chapter 1
  1-1
  1-2
  etc
  chapter 2
  etc
  chapter 3
  .
  .
  chapter 5
  5-1
  5-2
  etc


  Thank You
  Rachel



Other related posts: