I'm embarassed to admit that I didn't know about the rule that all books must have page numbers. Sometimes I get so far behind on reading the discussion emails that I give up. Perhaps an occasional newsletter will help folks catch up with important changes after an absence from the daily conversations. Monica in Maryland
--- Begin Message ---
- From: "mickey" <micka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:53:30 -0400
Thanks, Grace. I feel very guiltywhen I have to reject a book. I do everything I can to save it. When I've released it and said it was because of pagebreaks, I was told I should have rejected it. When I reject, I'm told I shouldn't. So I appreciate your understanding. Mickey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: comments on rejecting > Dear Volunteers: > > > > I am writing to tell you about a pet peeve of mine. I have noticed that > every time someone posts that they've rejected a book, there's always > emails in response saying that the person shouldn't have. Speaking for > myself, I do not reject a book lightly. If I really don't feel like > dealing with the book I release it. I only reject books that I feel would > take less time to rescan. Some might say that the collection loses out on > a potential gem. I will argue that if said book is that important someone > will take the time to rescan it. > > > > As for rejecting books due to lack of page breaks, doing so is following > bookshare policy. It has been 1 year since Bookshare has instituted the > policy of page breaks. In my opinion that's plenty of time for submitters > to learn to follow the rules. Validators spending many hours adding page > breaks is setting a bad precedent for submitters. They don't follow the > rules and yet their books still get accepted. Remember submitters get the > major credit for submitting the books and yet conscientious validators get > the grunt work and little to show for it. > > > > Frankly I don't post on the list when I reject books because of the > negative responses over time. I don't enjoy rejecting books at all. I > only do when it's necessary. Additionally if the reason for rejecting is > not valid the admin kicks it back and says to validate it. I have seen it > happen before. Also, nothing prevents the submitter from cleaning the book > up and resubmitting it. . > > > > As Mickey stated all we want to do is a good job. And in this case she was > following Bookshare policy. > > > > Although some people may prefer quantity over quality, the community does > prefer quality over quantity on the aggregate, as observed on a previous > bookshare survey. This includes proper pagination as well as clear > readable text. Therefore spending countless hours saving every book is not > always the best way to use our valuable time. Perhaps if less time was > spent cleaning up scanning messes more books could be added to the > collection. > > > > This is my 2 cents worth for today, or perhaps even the whole month. > *grin* > > > > Grace > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mickey" <micka@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:58 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Just rejected > > >>I get very confused. When I've released books because they didn't have >>page breaks, I was told I should have rejected them. When I reject, I'm >>told I should have kept. We need guidelines, because either way I go, >>someone figures I should have done it differently. All I want to do is do >>a good job. Maybe we can get Gustavo to put it back, since I told him >>what the reason was. >> >> Mickey >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:49 PM >> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Just rejected >> >> >>> Aah, Mickey. If you'd released it, I could have taken >>> it it. The book, at least in a couple of forms, is >>> available in my library systems, and it looks like one >>> I'd enjoy reading--and it's relatively short. smile. >>> >>> Cindy >>> >>> --- mickey <micka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. I had to reject Rutland Place by Anne Perry. >>>> There were no detectable >>>> page breaks. >>>> >>>> Good scan, too. >>>> >>>> Mickey >>>> >>>> Mickey Prahin >>>> Phone: (614) 670-4011 >>>> Check out Bob's new CD at >>>> http://www.boballentrio.com >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject >>>> line. To get a list of available commands, put the >>>> word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> __________________________________________________ >>> Do You Yahoo!? >>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject >>> line. >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list > of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
--- End Message ---