[bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: "Gary Petraccaro" <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:20:53 -0400
Then, does the staff put many books back?
----- Original Message -----
From: Evan Reese
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
No, you are correct. Rejecting a book removes it from Step 1. It can get back
on Step 1 if someone from the staff thinks the rejection is wrong for some
reason, but this doesn't usually happen.
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Petraccaro
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:55 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
Forgive my ignorance, but doesn't rejecting a book remove it from the step
one page? If not, how does that happen?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 11:48 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
But that doesn't help us who are looking for a book to validate and
trying
to avoid the poor submitters. I think E's idea is wonderful and hopefully
the benefit would be that when poor submitters' books stayed on the step
1
list for a long time, said submitter would get the idea that unless he
submits better scans, his books aren't going to be validated.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:25 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
> While volunteers do not know the identity of the siad Bookshare.org
> Volunteer, the staff have the capability of finding out. through the
> software.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jill O'Connell
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:29 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
>
> I really like that idea!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:35 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
>
>
>> You may notice I notice that books with less than excellent ratings are
>> listed sometimes as coming from "a bookshare volunteer".
>>
>> I respect the volunteer's need to remain anonymous though I frankly
fail
>> to quite understand the need. But i am sure I do need things others do
>> not understand. What about giving each "bookshare volunteer" a number.
>> So there might be "bv1" "bv75" and so on. Then feedback can be
addressed
>> to say, bv65. Or I might realize that I like the books bv115 scans. I
>> Might decide the books bv110 scans have the same kind of scanos time
>> after
>
>> time. I can then decide if I want to validate the scans of a
particular
>> bookshare volunteer. We validators have favorite submitters. We often
>> work in pairs (a submitter and a validator) to make a book come out
>> beautifully.
>>
>> E.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
list
>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 -
>> Release Date: 9/20/2007 12:07 PM
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
list
> of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:
> 9/20/2007 12:07 PM
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:
9/20/2007 12:07 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: 9/20/2007
12:07 PM
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Lori Castner
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Pratik Patel
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese
- [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Lori Castner
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Pratik Patel
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese