[bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Grandma Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
That's weird. If a validator read the books and found
scanning errors that weren't picked up by ranked
spelling or spell-check, he/she should have corrected
them and the books should have retained the Excellent
rating.
Unfortunately, validators aren't named like
submitters, even when they give permission. You can
ask here, of course--and maybe you can ask Claire to
let you know who the validators were so you can write
to ask them why the rating is only good.
Cindy
____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Shelley L. Rhodes
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Evan Reese
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Shelley L. Rhodes