[bksvol-discuss] Re: book released

Thanks for the advice, Kaitlyn. Until I read your
post, I didn't think to look at it and Elizabeth
didn't mention how long it had been on the download
list--(smile).  It was originally submitted in Sept. 
2004. I guess the submitter doesn't care much about
it. Hers is a name I don't recognizem either--she's
not the one usually talked about, E.
And it has been, I see, released a lot, though I
didn't count how many times.

Anyway, I have it now, and I'll get the book when I'm
ready to work on it. I'm going to do things that
people have specifically asked for first, like The
Amazing Bone. (More descriptions, but at least there's
a lot of text and the illustrations are relatively


-- Kaitlyn Hill <Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Cindy, 
> IF it is a book that has been there for a while
> definitely take it and work
> on it. From all I know about you, you do good work
> and a good book made
> available is better than seeing it rejected. 
> Kaitlyn 
> Healing Practitioner
> "The cost of a thing is the amount of what I call
> life, which is required to
> be exchanged for it immediately or in the long run."
> Henry Thoreau 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Cindy
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 8:16 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: book released 
> Elizabeth,
> Now I don't know whether to take you seriously or
> not
> (smile). An earlier email from you said the same
> about
> Out of Body, which I now have from the library, but
> your second on that subject said it was a real mess
> and maybe not worth saving. It is comparatively
> short,
>  though, and is a suspense novel, that I know people
> like, so I probably will do it.
> My library does have Shameless Exploitation
> available--unfortunately, I didn't read my mail
> before
> going this afternoon.
> So--with all the discussion about keeping books from
> the download list and renewing them, should I take
> it
> now, assuming nobody else wants it, or should I
> leave
> it up there until I'm ready for it? I've been taking
> things that are a mess and renewing them because I
> don't want them rejected, and this sounds like one
> that should not be rejected -- and one that
> probably,
> if anybody else takes, they'll either reject or
> release, and if I take no one will miss for a while.
> Opinions wanted, please.
> Cindy
> --- "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I went over Shameless Exploitation In Pursuit of
> the
> > Common Good by Paul 
> > Newman.  Someone needs a print copy here.  There
> > seem to be sections of 
> > junk characters which I do not understand.  They
> may
> > or may not be 
> > pictures.  Also there seem to be recipes and a
> print
> > copy would really help 
> > here.
> > 
> > Cindy this one may have your name on it.  It is in
> > txt format so pages will 
> > have to be protected by inserting appropriate page
> > breaks too.  Some are 
> > certainly missing.  The stripper would have a
> > fieldday with this on in its 
> > present form.
> > 
> > E.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

Other related posts: