[bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: "Scott Blanks" <scottsjb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:07:35 -0800
Jill and all,
The following text was taken from:
http://www.loc.gov/nls/reference/factsheets/readingdisabilities.html
It would seem that a large number of people with reading disabilities are not
automatically eligible, and in fact, would not be able to join the nls program
if their learning disability wasn't "physical". Here's the text:
Public Law 89-522 states that materials will be loaned to readers "certified by
competent authority as unable to read normal printed material as a result
of physical limitations, under regulations prescribed by the Librarian of
Congress for this service." The
current federal regulation
for this program is set forth in the Federal Register for June 7, 1974, as
amended October 2, 1981. Individuals with reading disabilities are not expressly
covered by this statute. Under Public Law 89-522, only persons whose reading
disabilities are physically based are eligible for the NLS talking-book program.
Furthermore, the reading disability must be certified by competent authority,
described below, as having a physical basis before an applicant is considered
for the talking-book program. An individual whose reading disability does not
have a physical origin is not eligible.
Applications for service from individuals claiming a reading disability based
on a physical handicap must establish the following facts:
list of 3 items
. the reading disability must be of sufficient severity to prevent reading
regular or standard printed material in a normal manner,
. the cause of the disability must be physically based, that is, it must be an
organic dysfunction, and
. the person certifying the application must be medically able to judge whether
the disability has a physical or organic basis.
list end
The following groups of individuals are not automatically eligible: those who
have learning disabilities, dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, attention
deficit-hyperactivity disorder, chronic-fatigue syndrome, autism, functional
illiteracy, or mental retardation, unless there is a specific accompanying
visual or physical handicap.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
Elizabeth, If you know this as a fact, I wish you would explain who these
people are and why they don't qualify with NLS but do with Bookshare. I would
also appreciate input from John Glass on this subject. Jill
----- Original Message -----
From: fledchen
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 5:02 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
Not everyone with a print disability qualifies for NLS. There are many
learning disabilities that do not qualify under NLS.
--Elisabeth Cyson
On Jan 6, 2008 12:41 AM, Jill O'Connell < jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see that this book is on the new books list. It is available both as a
web
braille book and a talking book. I fail to understand why anyone would
spend
their time scanning a book that is available in both forms from NLS. Jill
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1211 - Release Date: 1/6/2008
11:57 AM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1211 - Release Date: 1/6/2008
11:57 AM
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: fledchen
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: fledchen
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: atonement
- From: Jill O'Connell