Hi, Sue. I don't think it sounds selfish at all. If you choose books you're interested in reading, anyway, doing the kind of correcting I know you do just by reading your messages isn't as much of a chore as it otherwise might be if you chose something just to be doing it and not because you were interested in it. I know there are some validators out there who really do take the drier books...the ones no one else seems to want, but I think, if we're honest, a lot of validators can say the same thing you have. I know, when I validated, I did. Take care. Julie Morales Email: mercy421@xxxxxxxxxxx Windows/MSN Messenger only (no email): mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx Skype: mercy0421 ----- Original Message ----- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 5:06 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: another opinion e., i, A VALIDATOR ONLY, AGREE WITH YOU. mY SOLUTION IS TO PICK BOOKS THAT INTEREST ME SO THAT THE READING AND CORRECTING IS NO PROBLEM. tHIS MAY SOUND SELFISH, BUT SO BE IT. sUE s. ----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 3:40 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: another opinion > I could go further toward agreeing with you if those who scan use rank > spelling. I have rarely taken a document off step 1 where rank spelling is > not required, often extensively. Fixing errors in rank spelling takes a > good deal longer than twenty minutes. Not fixing errors means putting > books into the collection in the kind of shape which discourages new > users. Fixing things like 1 for I similarly takes some time. Results > without such fixing are tacky. > > E. > At 04:12 PM 6/11/2006, you wrote: > > > >To the validating perfectionists, > > > >While the time and effort you spend is wonderful and admirable, spending > >hours or days validating for fifty cents is ridiculous unless you have an > >inner drive and the satisfaction you receive for a perfect job is twenty > >times the remuneration. > > > >In the beginning, Jesse's estimated time for a validation was twenty > >minutes. I spend from two to three hours removing junk characters and > >spell checking after scanning and from the bookshare ratings and the > >comments I have had from many of the validators my scans are quite acceptable. > >In my opinion if it takes much longer to correct errors the book should be > >rejected and the submitter should receive no credits. > >Perhaps it might encourage better submissions. > > Jim > >.< > > > >To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list > >of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/360 - Release Date: 6/9/06 > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.