[bksvol-discuss] Re: alternatives to openbook and Kurzweil
- From: "Kaitlyn Hill" <Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:17:59 -0700
Hi Mike,
I would have to agree with you 100 percent. I always keep scans in my kes
files for just that reason. I have found a re-recognize has help in getting
a page right. Maybe that is why BookShare says to upload files in the
original scanning format.
Kaitlyn
Level III Practitioner
Reconnective healing and the Reconnection
Level 1 Reiki healing
Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Life is an inside job and light and love is everything:)
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Pietruk
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 2:39 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: alternatives to openbook and kurzweil
One of the nice things about having both ocr engines available in K1000 is
that one can flip between the two when having a particular page recognized
properly.
Sometimes, for whatever reason, the 2nd engine helps one figurre out
troublesome words; and sometimes a truly troublesome page can be put
together after aa2nd scan.
These kinds of things is what makes the expensive multi-purpose ocr
packages such as K1000 worth their weight in gold.
Other related posts:
