[bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- From: "Shelley L. Rhodes" <juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:42:31 -0400
Text Cloaner, which is much cheaper will work, smile, as will Fine Reader
both are much cheaper than kurzweil, though they don't have all the good
features that Kurzweil has either.
Shelley L. Rhodes B.S. Ed, CTVI
and Judson, guiding golden
juddysbuddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Guide Dogs For the Blind Inc.
Graduate Alumni Association Board
www.guidedogs.com
Dog ownership is like a rainbow.
Puppies are the joy at one end.
Old dogs are the treasure at the other.
Carolyn Alexander
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jill O'Connell" <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:50 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
I don't think it's the cost of a scanner that holds people back; it's the
cost of a good scanning program with Kurzweil costing almost $1000; this can
be a hardship for many would-be scanners. This is no way to be considered a
negative comment about Kurzweil, as in fact they are very generous in giving
copies of their program to award-winning college students as well as at
conventions for advertising purposes.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/456 - Release Date: 9/25/2006
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- From: Cindy
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- From: Jill O'Connell
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- From: Cindy
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: a sort of raise for validators
- From: Jill O'Connell