I haven't seen that book, but I have seen some other books where the scan had lots of errors. Often the problem is the difference in contrast between the typeface and the paper, and/or the size and kind of font. Cass Timberlane, for example, uses a very small font and because the book is old--1945--and a wartime book, there are a lot of words on a page, the contrast isn't that great. Shelley says the paper of the books she's sending me is somewhat yellowed, and I suspect that's the cause of scannos. For some reason, though, that I don't understand, people have noticed a lot of errors in LP books, especially with fractured lines, parts of which show up further down the page or sometimes on the next page. Cindy -- Gary Petraccaro <garyp130@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Has anyone sighted seen the book's typeface to give > some idea why it was misinterpreted? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: E. > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 8:13 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Computer millionaire > killed in air crash > > > Someone asked about the book I am currently > validating. It is We Borrow > the Earth: An Intimate Portrait of the Gypsy > Shamanic Tradition and Culture > Patrick Jasper Lee > > This is the one where v is mis-scanned as u and > other letter combinations > similarly miss-scanned. It started life as 95.5 > accurate and I got it up > to 99%. That does not count errors k1000 would > not catch like 1 for > I. This book is fascinating but fixing it up has > been out of the ordinary > to say the least. This is the book which got me > thinking about a utility > to substitute letters in mis-recognized k1000 rank > spelling list. > > E. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com