[bksvol-discuss] Re: Very very happy
- From: "Kim Friedman" <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:33:08 -0800
Hi, Jamie, thanks for the information. I just thought of a couple of
possibilities: 1. Somebody could inform Carrie about the book being
co-proofread and who was doing it. 2. If there was an arrangement to do
this, the proofreaders can agree on who does what. The idea is not to re-do
if the other person did a bang-up job. I suppose there would be mutual
checking. Oops, now there's the rub, we don't want to get into trouble with
the result of hurt feelings and whatnot. Regards, Kim. P.S.: I certainly
don't mind if Debby gets it. K.
_____
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamie Yates, CPhT
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:24 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Very very happy
Unfortunately the only way I know for two people to proofread one book is
one person to take it and work on it, then upload their work and ask Carrie
to put it back on step 1 with the work intact and then another person can
take it and complete it.
--
Jamie in Michigan
Currently Reading: Serpent's Tooth by Faye Kellerman
Earn cash for answering trivia questions every 3 hours:
http://instantcashsweepstakes.com/invitations/ref_link/49497
See everything I've read this year at: www.michrxtech.com/books.html
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4631 (20091123) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
