[bksvol-discuss] Re: The Wonders of Kurzweil

Oh, Jake, I feel your pain! *grin* I love Kurzweil and can only imagine what 
you're having to endure! *smile* Seriously, though, you're not the first one 
I've heard talk about OpenBook in this way and it is a shame they won't improve 
their product, but then, that just means more people in favor of Kurzweil, huh? 
Yeah! *smile* Take care.
Julie Morales
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger (but not email):
mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
Yahoo: julienstarsky
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jake Brownell 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:51 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] The Wonders of Kurzweil


  Please stop the onslaught! I've wanted K1K since last year when I was working 
to get new software from the state. Instead of listening to me however they 
purchased OpenBook. Currently I'm attempting to get them to let me trade in my 
OB for a copy of Kurzweil.

  OpenBooks scans aren't actually bad, but that shouldn't be surprising since 
the main engine is Fine Reader. It lacks greatly in updates and in *many* 
features that Kurzweil has, some small, some big. Some of them I would think 
would be easy to code, but Freedom Scientific seems to be content to chug along 
with what the program has in place already. For goodness sakes they could 
update the Microsoft Common Dialogue controls so the Open, Save, etc. dialogues 
work fully in a Windows XP environment.

  So just so you know everytime someone mentions a K1K feature I'm drueling in 
envy.

  Cheers!
  Jake

Other related posts: