[bksvol-discuss] Re: Rich Text Format
- From: "Julie Morales" <inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 03:06:43 -0700
Hi, Bud. There is sometimes a problem with files that are converted to RTF
through Kurzweil. RTF is preferable, though, so you've got that right. It has
to do with the conversion process. If your books are going through without a
problem, I wouldn't worry about it. This is just a problem some people have.
Take care.
Julie Morales
Email and Windows/MSN Messenger:
inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If your dog is fat, you aren't getting enough exercise. --Unknown
The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his
tongue. --Anonymous
----- Original Message -----
From: bud schwab
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 1:45 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Rich Text Format
I have been sending my books in rtf lately converted from kes. I hope this
is ok since that's what I thought I read that was more desirable. Now I'm
confused, I didn't know there was a problem. Please advise.
Bud schwab
At 12:05 PM 7/5/2004, you wrote:
Hi, Folks,
I finished checking "Remember When" by Nora Roberts. But when I went to
upload it, it said that I was not submitting rich text format. I saved it in
Word as .rtf, so why isn't it rich text format?
I sent a message to Jesse, who asked me if the book had been originally a
Kurzweil book converted to .rtf. I don't know, and can't remember the name of
the person who submitted it. Apparently, they have had some problems with
Kurzweil-converted books in the past. I forwarded the .rtf version to Jesse,
so hopefully he can resolve it. I suggested changing it to a .txt file, then
submitting it. No response about that yet. I think they prefer .rtf. Anybody
else have two cents worth on this one?
- Jackie McCraw
Seattle, WA
Bud Schwab
W 6 Z Y P
Malibu, California
Other related posts:
