[bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?

  • From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 00:13:20 -0700 (PDT)

Definitely. And you can post that on the list, too,
when you submit the book. It's more likely that
someone will validate it quickly if they know it
doesn't require much work.

Cindy


> Is it alright to make a
> note in the comments field when I know a book have
> been read through? 
> 
>  
> 
>      Kaitlyn
> No one is given a dream without also being given the
> power to make it come
> true
> 
> Reconnective Healing energy Practitioner
> Numerologist, Get your personal reading
> 
> Life is not measured by the number of breaths you
> take but by the number of
> moments that take your breath away:) 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jana Jackson
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 5:33 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?
> 
>  
> 
> Hi, Kaitlyn!  Correcting those errors is up to you. 
> Lately, a lot of us
> have been bitten by the perfectionist bug when it
> comes to validating, so I
> have to say that personally, I'd fix them. <Smile> 
> Hope this helps!
> 
>  
> 
> Jana
> 
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: siss52 <mailto:siss52@xxxxxxx>  
> 
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:38 PM
> 
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Reviewing a book?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Caitlin,
> 
>  
> 
> Some validators would correct those errors, and
> others would not.  For this
> reason a lot of us who do manual corrections pick
> books we would like to
> read.  
> 
>  
> 
> Sue S.
> 
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Kaitlyn Hill <mailto:Kaitlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> 
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:03 PM
> 
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Reviewing a book?
> 
>  
> 
> Hello All, 
> 
>  
> 
> I am working on a book that from the first 50 pages
> of it seems only to have
> an error maybe 2 per page but is still very
> readable. The major errors are
> in dates such as. I984 instead of 1984. What are the
> feelings on errors of
> this type?
> 
>  
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Other related posts: