[bksvol-discuss] Re: Rescanning Naomi Novik Temeraire

Perhaps for ease of access? Sometimes section brakes are hard to handle with in 
the bookshare app  if you don't use it I'm not sure that you know but if a 
section break is involved you can't really get two pages very easily I've not 
tried it with navigation but I know it went than normal navigation commands 
that are right with in the playback screen you can't go page by page if it's 
only section broken. At least you can't within the playback screen I've not 
tried as I said with the navigation where you go in and select the pages tab 
and try it that way but I'm not sure it would work.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 29, 2012, at 9:16 PM, "Mayrie ReNae" <mayrierenae@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Cindy,
>  
> Why, if a volunteer scan can't replace a PQ scan, would anyone want to scan 
> the book?
>  
> Just curious.  Just sounds like a waste of time to me unless image 
> descriptions were being added, and that could more easily be done using the 
> PQ book.
>  
> Mayrie
>  
>  
> 
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cindy
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2:11 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Rescanning Naomi Novik Temeraire
> 
> I'm not aware that PQ books cannot scanned. I know that PQ books replace  
> volunteer-scanned and-proofed books in the collection, but is it true that 
> once a publisher donates an ebook no volunteers cannot scan and/orproof that 
> book?
> 
> From: Dasha Radford <dasha95@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:47 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Rescanning Naomi Novik Temeraire
> 
> Then please do explain. Why does Book 6 contain  page breaks and not section 
> breaks if booked six is supposedly direct from the publisher and of publisher 
> quality?
> That one may not have been replaced with a publisher quality book yet but it 
> seems strange. Oh if anybody is interested there is a seventh one called 
> crucible of gold in that series. Either somebody here will need to scan it or 
> contact the publisher for it it should be possible.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 29, 2012, at 4:03 PM, "Judy s." <cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Dasha,
>> 
>> The Temeraire books are all publisher quality.  That means that they were 
>> submitted by a publisher and cannot be replaced by a volunteer scan. 
>> Publisher quality scans trump all other versions.
>> 
>> The reason the Temeraire books don't have page numbers or page breaks is 
>> that they came from electronic versions the publisher originally intended 
>> for e-readers. Many e-reader books do not have page numbers or page breaks 
>> in them. That's the way they are sold to sighted readers, so that's the way 
>> the come to Bookshare direct from the publisher.
>> 
>> The spelling errors as well are direct from the publisher, and can't be 
>> corrected by us volunteers.
>> 
>> Hope that helps explain why those books are that way! smile.
>> 
>> Judy s.
>> 
>> On 5/29/2012 9:33 AM, Dasha Radford wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> If somebody was interested in doing this it might be helpful. I just 
>>> recently downloaded the copies of Naomi Novik's Temeraire adventures 
>>> series. There is something I noticed in book one and I know it is true in 
>>> the first one and I'm not sure but I can check the others. That one seems 
>>> to only have section breaks and no page breaks as well as some very clear 
>>> spelling errors. I'll check the others but I'm wondering. If someone still 
>>> has the copies of these books could they rescan them and put them up for 
>>> proofreading? I would like to see if we can't improve the quality.
>>> Thanks to all and let me know what you guys think,
>>> DR Sent from my iPhone To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
>>> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 

Other related posts: