[bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: "Sarah Van Oosterwijck" <curiousentity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:10:57 -0500
Yes, two validators would be better than one, but if the second one never
came along it would be worse than having the same person as scanner and
validator. :-) With some of the titles I see on the download list, I am
sometimes sure the submitter is the only person who will ever do it.
That reminds me that i should check for the book on developing C++ software
for the Symbian OS used on cell phones. That sounds challenging to
validate and I have made my husband indignant about how things can sit
there forever just because no one feels they can take on the project. He
said he would help me give it a spot check so it doesn't languish on the
download list forever.
I have selfish motives. I was hoping that looking at the book would make
him interested enough to write something for my phone, and that would be an
excuse to make him look at it. I can't find an excuse to let him look at
it once it is in the collection, because that would violate the bookshare
rules. ;-)
Sarah Van Oosterwijck
Assistive Technology Trainer
http://home.earthlink.net/~netentity
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Kasondra payne
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Kaitlyn Hill
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Scott Blanks
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Kasondra payne
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Kaitlyn Hill
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Quality and validation credits
- From: Scott Blanks