[bksvol-discuss] Re: Lenora Mattingly Weber books

  • From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:21:26 -0500

The funny thing for me is that visually it looks like the synonym to goofy, 
kooky.  I do not remember the spelling with a "y"; am I too young or was it 
regional.  I am in my late 40's...

Valerie


On Apr 10, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Debby Franson wrote:

> Hi everyone!
> 
> I was tought the spelling of cooky too, so my mind had a lot of resistance to 
> spelling it cookie.  It just seemed wrong to me, but I know language is 
> changing all the time, sometimes evolving but often these days, devolving 
> imho.
> 
> Debby
> 
> At 03:39 PM 4/8/2010, gwen tweedy wrote
>> Oh how cool like the older way LOL.
>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: <mailto:rhyami@xxxxxxxxx>Monica Willyard
>>> To: <mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:18 AM
>>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Lenora Mattingly Weber books
>>> 
>>> Hi Jamie. I was taught that cookie should be spelled cooky in my home 
>>> economics classes in the 70s. It's also spelled that way in a lot of older 
>>> cookbooks from the 40s through the mid 70s. I was puzzled when I noticed 
>>> the change in spelling in books starting in the early 80s. It changed 
>>> quickly, sort of like the pronunciation of Los Angeles which used to be 
>>> pronounced with a hard g sound by both radio announcers and government 
>>> officials in the 30s and 40s. Our language really is a living, breathing 
>>> one that handles changes well.
>>> 
>>> Monica Willyard
>>> Check out my books and accessible book lists on Goodreads at
>>> <http://www.goodreads.com/profile/plumlipstick>http://www.goodreads.com/profile/plumlipstick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------
>>> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamie Yates, CPhT
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:45 PM
>>> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Lenora Mattingly Weber books
>>> 
>>> Hi Jamie, it will be an easy proof. There are some unusual words in it, 
>>> like they say:
>>> 
>>> "We never would have got the lights unsnangled if it hadn't been for him."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And unsnangled is kind of weird you know.
>>> 
>>> And later they say maybe they can unSTRANGLE them instead of unsnangle them.
>>> 
>>> And one time so far they call a deli a delly.
>>> 
>>> And a cooky sheet.
>>> 
>>> And one time they call it a stero instead of stereo so far.
>>> 
>>> And a torn legament instead of a ligament.
>>> 
>>> That's what I've found so far. Other than the strange words I think you'll 
>>> have an easy time proofreading so when it's ready I'll put hold for Jamie P.
>>> --
>>> Jamie in Michigan
>>> 
>>> Currently Reading: The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction by Linda Gordon
>> 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2801 - Release Date: 04/09/10 
>> 13:32:00
> 
> 
>        --
> mailto:<the.bee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> Enjoy what you have rather than desiring what you don't have. Just dreaming 
> about nice things is meaningless; it is like chasing the wind.--Ecclesiastes 
> 6:9 NLT
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
> 

 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: