[bksvol-discuss] Re: Improving excellent books

  • From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:35:29 -0400

The part which proved nto be efficient was re-submitting html files after correction. The correction of mistakes such as 1 for I worked fine but page breaks got messed up. If bookshare staff can re-release a rtf file we can make spelling corrections and fix scanos while retaining the page breaks and numbering.


E.


At 08:26 AM 4/17/2008, you wrote:
I really think they changed to doing as they do because doing this
kind of thing didn't prove to be efficient at all.

Cindy Lou Ray. Each day is a new adventure.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Devorah Greenstein" <DGreenstein@xxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Improving excellent books


Bob,
I think that's a great idea. When I validate I really try hard to get
perfect but I always have a gut feeling that, despite my looking at
every capital I, there are still going to be a few number ones lurking
still uncorrected.

I really like your idea, of having a process to incorporate minor
improvements so the library.

Devorah

-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 5:02 AM
To: bookshare volunteer discussion
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Improving excellent books

Lately when I've downloaded books that are rated excellent, I find
that,
in
general, they really are excellent. However, they may have an
occasional
1
for I or misspelled words that you know are scanning errors.

Now, these books are fine as they are--we've all learned to correct
those
little errors in our heads and to go on reading.

But, they could be improved. I was wondering if we could somehow
resubmit a
book with minor changes without having to go through the whole process
of
putting it on step 1 as a "bso" book, having someone else validate it,
and
have a staff approve it. That seems very inefficient, and a waste of
time
just for a few errors.

But, if a method could be developed to include these minor
improvements,

then the library could always be increasing in quality.

I don't think this effort would even merit credits. It's just a way to
improve an already excellent collection.

What do you think?

Bookshare staff, does this idea have a chance?

Bob
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is
the only thing that ever has."--Margaret Mead

 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.

 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.


 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.


__________ NOD32 3033 (20080417) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: