[bksvol-discuss] Re: Hold fors

  • From: "EVAN REESE" <mentat3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:12:12 -0500

Hahaha! I always have a copy of whatever I'm proofreading, and I would check to 
see if it was in fact a misprint or a scannoe.

That's one of the most painful parts of this proofreading thing, leaving in 
misprints. Not changing wrong information is almost as bad. I recently scanned 
a biography, and the author got a date for an important event that I know is 
wrong. But the proofreader and I have to leave it as it is, knowing it's wrong.

Evan
 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gary Petraccaro 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:38 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Hold fors


  The funny thing is that I'm afraid the person re-reading my book will be too 
serious and undo all the work I lovingly put in to preserve every typo.  <grin>

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: EVAN REESE 
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:53 AM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Hold fors


    If I scan a book without reading through it, for whatever reason, and I put 
    it up there without a hold for, then how do I ensure that it goes to 
someone 
    such as yourself rather than someone who is, in fact, a careless slob. 
    Please answer that question for me if you can.

    Others have seen it happen, which is one reason I now get books held for me 
    by those people instead of them being just sent up and passed on, 
    apparently,  without a glance at the text.

    Evan

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Tracy Carcione" <carcione@xxxxxxxxxx>
    To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:40 AM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Hold fors


    > Gee, thanks a lot.  I guess those of us who don't ask for and get hold
    > fors are just a bunch of careless slobs?  NOT!!!
    > It's annoying to hunt through the list, and find hold for after hold for,
    > and on books I would really be interested in working on, too.  But it
    > appears some people have their own pet proofreaders, and the rest of us
    > are just not worthy.
    >
    > I agree with the suggestion that the "hold for" should go away for a
    > while.  If not 4 weeks, then how about 8?  I'm sure it would be too
    > difficult for engineering to manage, but after a while, I'm highly tempted
    > to just take the darned thing.  I've seen books sitting on the queue for
    > quite a while with a hold for, when all along I would be happy to proof
    > them.  But I forgot; I'm not worthy of such special books.
    > Tracy
    >
    >> The point about contacting the person for whom the book is being held is 
    >> a
    >> good one. Last year, I had a Hold for up there for three weeks before I
    >> found out about it because I don't check that list very often unless I'm
    >> expecting something. I did know the book was coming, and had asked for it
    >> to be held for me, but I didn't know exactly when it would be submitted. 
    >> I
    >> only learned of it because someone else, not the submitter, told me I had
    >> a Hold for up there.
    >>
    >> In general, I use Hold fors quite a lot because its the only way of
    >> ensuring that a book will actually be proofread, not just passed through
    >> to the admin queue with the bear minimum. Even if I read through 
    >> something
    >> I submit, someone else will always find something I missed in their read
    >> through of the book. Then there are books that I scan that I do not 
    >> choose
    >> to read through. I absolutely want to ensure that those get at least one
    >> read through before getting into the collection. Those are scanned to
    >> order though, so that isn't a problem, and I always contact the
    >> proofreader so the books get picked up, often within minutes.
    >>
    >> I also get hold fors from others for the same reason. They trust me to
    >> actually read through the book and make corrections. I still put books up
    >> there without hold fors, but I often feel uncomfortable just submitting a
    >> book and hoping for the best.
    >>
    >> So for me and others that I know, the hold for has become the best kind 
    >> of
    >> quality assurance.
    >>
    >> But there definitely needs to be good communication between the submitter
    >> and the proofreader to make things work efficiently.
    >>
    >> Evan
    >>
    >>   ----- Original Message -----
    >>   From: Monica Willyard
    >>   To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>   Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:45 PM
    >>   Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Hold fors
    >>
    >>
    >>   Hi Mickey. Over time, I am slowly shifting my point of view on the hold
    >> for issue. It used to be that less than ten percent of books were hold
    >> fors, and I was content with that level. I still think it has value and
    >> is needed in instances like Marilyn's or when someone needs help with
    >> fixing up recipes, charts, and such. I have seen it abused though, and
    >> I'm beginning to think we're going overboard as a group. I don't mean
    >> that any specific person is doing this. I think it's more of a group
    >> drift. I was startled Sunday night when I discovered that the entire
    >> first page of books were hold fors when I went to look at books. I have
    >> mine set to 50, and I didn't find one single book on that page that
    >> wasn't being held for someone. In fact, only 16 books from page 2 didn't
    >> have holds. I don't mind it if a person is actively working on a project
    >> or is taking the books to proofread on a consistent basis. I recognized
    >> some of the names like Marilyn's and understand what's going on with her
    >> holds. After some thought, I wrote to a few of the people with books
    >> being held for them, and three of them didn't even know someone had
    >> posted books for them.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   I don't have a great solution here. I'll bet we can come up with one
    >> that works well, if not perfectly. I guess I would just ask people to
    >> take a couple of very quick precautions. If a book is being held for you
    >> and you find that you can't handle it, just post to the list. We
    >> understand that life happens and would rather get the book proofread
    >> than have you tied up in knots because you can't do it. If you are
    >> someone who submits books with holds on them, I ask you to consider
    >> doing two things. First, if your book is going to be held for someone,
    >> please make a point of writing or calling them to let them know the book
    >> is available once you submit it. Second, if your book has special needs
    >> like recipes that need to be fixed, please note that in the comments.
    >> That way, if your proofreader can't take on the book after some time,
    >> Carrie could remove the hold with your permission and let another
    >> qualified volunteer work on it. These things would keep communication
    >> flowing for all of us. Maybe that would be enough to help us get back on
    >> track with each other. What do you think?
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   Monica Willyard
    >>
    >>   "The best way to predict the future is to create it." -- Peter Drucker
    >>
    >>
    >> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>
    >>   From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mickey
    >>   Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:48 PM
    >>   To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >>   Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Hold fors
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   Hi. I just went to get a book to validate, but I'm truly discouraged.
    >> There are so many hold for books that I have the definite feeling that
    >> only the ones nobody else wants are available. There are some people who
    >> have 10 and 12 books waiting for them.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   I'm sorry, I'm just discouraged. Some of those books have been there 
    >> for
    >> a long time. Maybe if a book has been in the queue for two weeks, the
    >> hold should be removed? Just a thought, and probably a very unpopular
    >> one. <smile>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   Not trying to be destructive, only trying to get books out there.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>   Mickey
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
    > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list 
    > of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
    > 

     To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
    bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: