[bksvol-discuss] Re: Funky change in Roger's emails plust question about plain text e-mails.
- From: Jackie McBride <abletec@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:36:25 -0700
Lynn, u queried:
If you send e-mail in plain text and it contains a link, can the link be
copied or retrieved in the same way as if the message were sent in HTML
format?
Yes. To ensure that, sometimes it's helpful to enclose the url in
angle brackets, e.g., a < (less than) sign precedes the link & a >
(greater than) sign follows.
On 12/5/09, Lynn I <lynnskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger!
>
> Are you using Word to compose messages in your e-mail program, or , is your
> font color set to black? I know there is a font color button in Word. I
> don't remember seeing one in Outlook Express or Outlook. All that being
> said, it doesn't mean that's the problem--just a thought.
>
> Judy!
>
> If you send e-mail in plain text and it contains a link, can the link be
> copied or retrieved in the same way as if the message were sent in HTML
> format? Goes to show you how very little I know about computers. I'm just
> wondering what the major disadvantage is to sending most e-mail in plain
> text.
>
> Blessings.
>
> Lynnsky
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy s.
> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 7:09 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Funky change in Roger's emails
>
> Nope, it didn't help. It's still coming through as black font against black
> background.
>
> Try Jackie's suggestion, maybe, of changing your email so it goes
> out as plain text?
>
> Judy s.
>
> Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> AOL 8.0. And by the way, the time period Judy mentioned for this
>> change in my emails about coincided with the last time I changed the
>> quote in my signature, so I just now fiddled around with that again. Did
> that help?
>>
>> "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion
>> in it." [ in a letter to Thomas Jefferson] John Adams
>>
>> The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder
> Press:
>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com
>> Granma International: http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
>> _
>>
>> table with 2 columns and 6 rows
>> Subj:
>> [bksvol-discuss] Re: Funky change in Roger's emails
>> Date:
>> 12/5/2009 6:08:06 PM Eastern Standard Time
>> From:
>> cdrobles693@xxxxxxxxx
>> Reply-to:
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To:
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent from the Internet
>> (Details)
>> table end
>>
>> What client are you using? Perhaps my buddy who helped me can help
>> you?----------------"If you go without playing the trumpet for one
>> day, no one knows, two days, only you know, and more than three days
>> without practicing, girl you better look out, because everyone will
>> know!" Today, I find myself constantly saying those words, just to get
>> myself going, to not give up, and it works.
>> Since I learned to play the trumpet at the tender age of 10, I have
>> spent so much passion and much diligence with that instrument that I
>> will not give up on it. Sometimes my instrument puts me into awkward
>> situations where I feel like they won't ever end, but the trumpet
>> gives me a lot of hope with the majestic, crystal-clear sound it
>> brings to my ears.----------------Chela
>> RoblesE-Mail:
>>
>> cdrobles693@xxxxxxxxx
>> MSNWindowsLive Messenger:
>> cdrobles693@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Skype: jazzytrumpet----- Original Message ----- From:
>> Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx
>> To:
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 1:09 PMSubject: [bksvol-discuss] Re:
>> Funky change in Roger's emailsI was unaware of that. Does anyone know
>> how I can fix it?"This would be the best of all possible worlds, if
>> there were no
>> religion in it." [ in a letter to Thomas Jefferson] John Adams
> The
>> Militant:
>> http://www.themilitant.com
>> Pathfinder Press:
>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com
>> Granma International:
>> http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
>> _table with 2 columns and 6 rowsSubj:[bksvol-discuss]
>> Funky change in Roger's emails Date:12/5/2009 3:53:18 PM Eastern
>> Standard Time From:cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Reply-to:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To:bksvol-d iscuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent from the Internet (Details)table endHey Roger,You've got some
>> funky html coding that's been going on for two or three days in your
>> emails coming to the list. It makes the background blackand the font
>> black, except for your .sig file. So for what it's worth, they're
>> unreadable by a sighted person like myself.
>> The only way I can read themis to look at them is by resetting your
>> messages into "text" messages.I'm using Thunderbird to read email, and
>> I don't know if any of the other sightedvolunteers are experiencing
>> this with your emailsJudy s.Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx wrote:> That may be
>> the case for you, but for us who do not have access tonor the > skill
>> to use an optacon it does not apply.> > > "This would be the best of all
> possible worlds, if there were no
>> religion > in it." [ in a letterto Thomas Jefferson] John Adams > >
>
>> The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder
>> Press: > http://www.pathfinderpress.com>
>> GranmaInternational: http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html>
>
>> _> > table with 2 columns and 6 rows> Subj:> [bksvol-discuss] Re:
>> For Gwen andRobert > Date:> 12/5/2009 2:47:53 AM Eastern Standard
>> Time > From:> the.bee@xxxxxxxxxxx > Reply-to:>
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To:> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent
>> from the Internet > (Details)> table end> > Hi Roger!I have been
>> thinking about this subject.In a way, I think that > scanning is
>> easier, because,when I am doing step one of proofreading, I have >
>> the> hard copy in front of me that I can check with the optacon when
>> there is a > scano I am unsureof.
>> When
>> I am proofreading others submissions, I don't > have> the hard copy,
>> so I can only figure out scanos that are obvious or some > from
>> context,feeling a bit unsure at times.DebbyAt 10:55 PM 11/30/2009, >
>> rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx>
>> wrote>As a matter of fact, I think proofreading is easier than
>> wrote>scanning.>
>> Unless
>>> you are submitting a raw scan it is proofreading with extra work. >>
>> Nevertheless> Kim, I would urge you to take the plunge and try some
>>scanningtoo.
>> The > more you learn about scannning the more you learn about >using a
>> computer in > general.>>>> "I have no country to fight for; my country
>> is theearth,
>> and I am a >> citizen of the world." Eugene V. Debs>> The
>> Militant: > <> http://wwww.themilitant.com>http://www.themilitant.com>
>> PathfinderPress:
>>> <http://www.pathfinderpress.com>>
>>> http://www.pathfinderpress.com>Granma
>> International: ><http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html>>
>> http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html>>
>> _>>table with 2 columns and 6 rows>Subj:>[bksvol-discuss]
>> Re: > For Gwen and Robert>Date:>11/30/2009 10:37:56 PM Eastern
>> Standard Time>From:>
>>> kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>Reply-to:>bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:>>
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent> from the Internet>(Details)>table
>> end>> My goodnessGwen, you have nothing > to fear when it comes to
>> proofreading > should you decide to do it. One thing> I can tell you
>> is that there are >many ways> to doit. I have a BrailleNote > mPower
>> and I use it as a Braille display > while I read a book from the >
>> beginning> to the end. I listen to my screen
>> reader>readthe text while I follow along > with my fingers using the
> BrailleNote.
>>> I'd call it kind of like a feedback> or redundancy thing. Have you
>>> seen
>> those>floursifters with double or > triple screens in them? Think of
>> those>what I do
>> as >if I were sifting flour because > what> the ears hear the fingers
>> check. I have>tomake sure that everything is all > present and
>> accounted for, title,
>>> author bylines, copyright dates, ISbn > numbers,>publishers,> etc.
>>> After
>> the prefatorymaterial I read every word of the >book. Now I'm > taking
>> in the story (if I'm reading fiction), I'm checking >to see if>there >
>> are> any errors in thescan you might have missed. If I find any, I
>> >use the > delete key so I only get rid of stuff that is extraneous to
>> the text.>I'd write> you and let youknow what I'm doing. If I come
>> across a bit of >something > in the text I'm not sure about, I'd email
>> you and ask you about it,>pasting > the> bit of textI'm having trouble
>> with in the email to you. You'd >send me the
>>> copy of what the text should be, and I make sure it's in the file>I'm
>>> >
>> working> with.One thing I heard right from the start was to have a
>> working> >copy of
>> the
>>> file that isn't touched in case I mess up the one I'm working
>>> with.>I'm
>> still > in>the beginning stages of this thing. I don't do anything >fancy.
>
>> Eventually
>>> I expect to learn the art of this. What I want to know >is if
>>> the>text
>> makes>sense. I don't heed the word processing program should it have
>> makes>>grammar
>>> suggestions for me. If I come across a weird spelling of a word or
>>> >name,>
>> I'd> want> to know how many times it's in the text. I'd probably write
>> you
>>> to verify > that the word and the way it's spelled is supposed to be
>>> in
>> the text.>My> philosophy> is to do just enough and err on the side of
> caution.
>> Some >people may not > use Braille at all when proofreading while
>> others do. I'm still>learningthe> ropes, but so far what I've done is
>> in the Bookshare
>>> collection so I must > be doing something right or at least I hope
>>> this is so. Nobody will>twist> your> arm and you can proofread
>>> anything that
>> interests
>> you. So far >everything > has interested me. The very first thing I
>> did was a children's book,>butthe> others I've done are fiction books for
> grownups.
>> Regards, Kim.>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---->>From:>bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>
>> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of gwen tweedy>Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 2:56 PM>To:>
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: For Gwen
>> and > Robert>> I too assumed that those books would go very fast
>> simply from thingsI>> have read here from time to time.>I think they
>> are getting lost in the > admin cue now that would be up to him >to
>> correct me if I am wrong.>And yesfor> me, if I were a proof reader,
>> except for some of the books >he's helped me > with, I wouldn't read
>> them either I just can't read those >kinds of>books.>>As> for my
>> books, I've learned a lot, I feel that even as much as recently >I >
>> have gotten better, but as for myself, I am keenly aware that my
>> booksmight>> be> as fast on the uptake because of my past reputation
>> as a new scanner.>So I
>>> understand that, and can now deal with that.>If I find that Iam not
>> making> it I promise you, I'll be the first to >leave volunteering
>> making> altogether, >
>> because I do not need nor want to be in >the way of>good
>> readingmaterial
>> here> bookshare is so famous for.>I promise you, I would not want
>> here> anyone
>> putting
>>> up junk from me that would >not be fair to y'all.>Some thingsyou can
>> learn,> some things a person can't and if I fail to get >it, then I'm
>> out of here
>>> lock stock and barrel.>Most here scan and proof excellently,and I
>>> would
>> no > more > tarnish >that reputation for this whole world.>It was my
>> hope when I > first put my name up to be a volunteer to put up
>> >moreof the Christian type of> books, if not Christian wholesome
>> >books those my>grandma would care to > read.>But that wholly has not
>> happened, from a numberof factors of my own >> making> the buck stops
>> here as it were.>If I fail to meet this my personal goal, > that at
>> that time, which could be >today, tomorrow,or perhaps never then I >
>> would> bow out and leave it to those>who know best.>I wish I could
>> proof books, > but I've bungled scans lord knows what I'ddo > to a
>> proof.>Plus there are so > many> rules to proofing my lands I couldn't
>> keep up with >them all, that is to > hard for me simple mind LOL.>I
>> mostlikely should have just stuck to reading> > it would have been a
>> lot >less trouble for us all.>You have a wonderful > day,>Gwen>>block
>> quote>----- OriginalMessage ----->From:>Monica Willyard>To:>>
>> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent:>
>> Monday,
>> November 30, 2009 3:26 PM>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] For Gwen and>
>> Robert> Gwen, you're right. Robert is an experienced and valuable
>> member of our>> community.
>> Robert, how many books do you have that are waiting to be>> approved?
>> Are> they on step 1 or in the admin queue?>>Gwen, there are several >
>> factors> in play regarding Robert's books. I don't >know if you're
>> awareof all of > these, so I thought I'd share them. Some of them>can
>> probably be addressed by> people on this list. Others can't.>>On the
>> staff side, Carriewas on > vacation for a week before Thanksgiving.
>> >Also, most of the staff had some time >
>> off> last week for the holiday. I >have found>that she
>> off> generallyapproves
>> books > from volunteers within 24 to 48 hours of >their entry into the
>> admin queue.> Carrie used to be a volunteer just like us,>and she
>> remembersthe > frustration of waiting and waiting for a book to be
>> >approved. She has worked with >
>> Robert> as a fellow volunteer as well and knows>of his skillsand
>> Robert> flexible >
>> attitude.>> From here, it looks like the bottleneck right now is in
>> getting books >> proofread. The number of books on step 1 is pilingup
>> again. Our number > > of active>volunteers and their preferences for
>> reading determine how fast a > book> is >processed. This factor
>> affects everyonewho submits books. For awhile > everyone>was worried
>> about not having any books to work on.
>> Some
>> people quit>> looking for new books on step 1 becauseof all of the
>> books with holds on >> them. Now>there are a lot of excellent books
>> needing a proofreader.>>The
>>> other> factor, on a more personal level,is hard for me to explain. >
>> Robert is a > consistent and dedicated volunteer. I respect him for
>> his >
>> dedication>and
>>> teamwork.> Yet I am hesitant to takehis books for a personal reason.
>>> >In
>> the past, > Robert has been willing to scan some adult-rated content
>> for > Bookshare.>It's> my perception that muchof what he scans would
>> be classified as >steamy > romances. I prefer not to read the steamier
>> books. This isn't about >Robert>or>
>>
>> his skills as a submitter.It's about me and what I want to read. I >>
>> generally don't like to draw attention to this issue since I think
>> it's a >>
>> personal>
>> one>on my part. SinceI feel uncomfortable asking Robert which books
>> one>are >>
>> adult, I let others take his books when he submits. I figured it would
>> >make>
>>
>> him angry>if I askedabout it. If I am wrong about what Robert submits,
>> I > apologize >and take full responsibility for not checking out my
>> assumptions
>>> with> him.>>I thinkwhat I'm saying is that we might do a better job
>>> with> of >
>> communicating >with each other. I know I need to do that. I didn't
>> know that Robert's>> books weren't>gettingadded to the collection. I
>> also assumed that most > people are more >comfortable with adult
>> content than I am and that those would> be done quickly.>Icould be
>> wrong on both counts.>>The last thing I want is > for you or Robert to
>> feel ignored or >unappreciated. I don't have an > immediate>
>> solution.I think we could find >ways to work this>out together, with
>> the > help of the Bookshare community. It would help us >fix the
>> problem if we know> exactlywhat's going on, if the books are on step
>> 1,> or are they getting > lost in the admin queue.>>Monica
>> Willyard>"The best way to predict the future> is tocreate it." --
>> Peter Drucker>>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---->At 10:32 AM
>>
>> 11/30/2009, you wrote:>> block>quote>I think a timely manner is the
>> key.> And those who have scanned for > years and their books are good,
>> and >everyone knows they are good, to me there>shouldn't be a
>> delay.>Some books get up there right away, so what is the > difference
>> in books?> Especially those of like Robert's when his books
>> have>been tried and > true for a long time.> Eventually volunteers
>> are gonna > quit submitting books, because they > aren't getting
>> anywhere. Some books> stay> up there for a long time.>It's grand
>> for kids books grand for grants, but > I think they are >forgetting the
>
>> submitters
>> especially those hardworking> ones like Bob >who turns in>a quality
>> scan each and every time not like his > wife who turns no quality
>> >scans LOL.>I understand me, but Bob thatis > different.>His> should
>> go right away.>Gwen>>----- Original Message ----->From:>robert >
>> tweedy>To:>bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent:
>> Monday, November30, 2009 11:58 AM>> Subject:> [bksvol-discuss] Re:
>> What is the main concern these days?>>That's fine as > long as our
>> books get into the system on a timeymatter.>----- Original > Message>
>> ----->From:>Denise
>> Thompson>To:>bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Tuesday, > December
>> Thompson>01, 2009 2:50
>> PM>Subject: [bksvol-discuss]Re: What is the main > concern> these
>> PM>days?>>I
>> think BKS's concern is to do books that fit their grant > money. >
>> educational which seems to be most booksfor kids and teens in
>> addition> to >text books,> of course. Adult books don't seem to be
>> educational- > especially those that
>>> have some romance in them.Since they have out-sourcers and> do their
>>> grant
>>> books>with them as well as in house, I feel like I need to > continue
>>> books>to
>> scan
>>> adult books for the restof us who aren't students and who> don't want
>>> to >
>> read kids>books and teen books.>Denise>> At 09:32 AM > 11/30/2009, you
>> wrote:>block
>> quote>I've noticeda strong emphasis on children's > books> as well.
>> quote>This is
>>> wonderful, so long as it isn't at the expense of books > for us
>>> adults,
>> too.>>Melissa>>roberttweedy
>> wrote:>block quote>I am just > wondering> about bookshare policy of
>> submitted books. Taking a >look at the cue, it > looks like children's
>> bookswhich is okay but what >about books>that are just> for
>> pleasure.>block quote end>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank >
>> Email to> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>putthe
>> word 'unsubscribe' by > itself> in the subject line. To get a list
>> >of available commands, put the word > 'help' by itself in the subject
>> line.> blockquote
>> end>block quote end>>block > quote> end>>__________ Information from
>> end>ESET
>> NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4650
>> (20091130)__________>>The message was checked by ESET> NOD32
>> Antivirus.>>http://www.eset.com>> __________ Information from ESET >
>> NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus>signature database 4650 (20091130) >
>> __________>>The> message was checked by ESET NOD32
>> Antivirus.>>http://www.eset.com>>> __________ Information fromESET
>> NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >signature > database> 4650
>> (20091130) __________>>The message was checked by ESET NOD32 >
>> Antivirus.>>http://www.eset.com>>Novirus
>> found
>> in this incoming message.>Checked by> AVG - www.avg.com>Version:
>> 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.88/2537 - > Release Date: 11/30/09 >
>> 15:05:00--Enjoywhat you have rather than desiring what > you> don't
>> have. Just dreaming about nice things is meaningless; it is like >
>> chasing the wind.--Ecclesiastes6:9 NLTTo unsubscribe from this list
>> send a > blank> Email tobksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx the
>> word 'unsubscribe' by > itself in the subjectline. To get a list of
>> available commands, put the > word> 'help' by itself in the subject
>> line.> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email
>> tobksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
>> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.95/2546 - Release Date: 12/05/09
> 02:13:00
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
--
Change the world--1 deed at a time
Jackie McBride
www.abletec.serverheaven.net
Please join me Saturday, 11/7, on my walk against breast cancer by
making a donation at:
http://main.acsevents.org/goto/larkspur>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts: