I agree wtih you Guido.
I'll give it a bit of time for Sharon to contact me but if not soon, its
getting nuked. I really hate doing this, but for me, getting a great
quality book isn't too hard, because I"ll spend an hour or two fixing a
book for a while, but if I go through the thing finding lots of garbled
pages, its kind of annoying to read. On the onverse, I've read books with
a good rating that I enjoyed.
Ner At 12:28 PM 6/22/2004, you wrote:
97.8 accuracy means an error rate greater than 2%. That combined with chars missing towards the spine make the book almost decyphrable but virtually unreadable. I strongly suggest the book be nuked.
Guido
Guido D. Corona IBM Accessibility Center, Austin Tx. IBM Research, Phone: (512) 838-9735 Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visit my weekly Accessibility WebLog at: http://www-3.ibm.com/able/weblog/corona_weblog.html
Noel Romey <ner@xxxxxxxx> Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/22/2004 11:56 AM Please respond to bksvol-discuss
To bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject [bksvol-discuss] Euginia Price books
I believe Sharon Jackson uploaded some of the books by Euginia Price. I don't know if it is the case for all the books, but I've just gotten Bright Captivity, a romance novel <sigh>, and there are many many characters missing near the spine of the book. I'll get the other ones and see if this is the case as well, but it might be easier to rescan this book rater than editing it. K1k reports 97.8 percent accuracy. Can Sharon contact me to see what the bestthing to do with it is?
Ner
Noel Romey Arkansas, USA View my insights at my live journal: http://djner.livejournal.com
Noel Romey Arkansas, USA View my insights at my live journal: http://djner.livejournal.com
