Hi, Gary. I'm so relieved! I had this horrible, sinking worry that somehow I'd royally messed up the version that's in the collection. It did have some things that needed to be fixed when I validated it, but it was a very nice scan too. Validating isn't my strong suit, as I prefer to scan. I validate books because it needs to be done, but I always worry that I've missed something that someone will be sure to notice.
Monica Willyard Gary Petraccaro wrote:
I just reread my first message and owe Shelley an appology for it's poor phrasing. What I meant to be understood as saying was that I just took a look at the latest Coulter which my library just lent me. I had requested it some 4 months previous. I scanned it for amusement and got the results I sited--no page better than 99.6, and most around 99 in terms of accuracy. I then looked at the rating Shelley's version had and it said excellent. My message was a request for the settings she had used to obtain her results. I sincerely hope this clears things up. Btw, when all was said and done, I had 257 words as flagged by rank spelling when capitals were excluded.
