[bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins

  • From: "solsticesinger" <solsticesinger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 23:22:51 -0600

If this is the case, we might as well just go back to accepting fair quality 
books, if quantity is becoming more important than quality.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: EVAN REESE 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:40 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins


  I don't know the answer to that, but the outsourcers do a great many books. 
There may just be too many books and not enough proofreaders for them all. 
Bookshare has to meet a goal stipulated by the grant they got, and it may be 
that they decided that there just wasn't enough time or resources to read all 
those books that need to be scanned to meet the number. Or, perhaps a better 
way of putting it would be that there was a cost/benefit decision made that the 
gain in quality by reading through each book wasn't an efficient use of 
resources if the scans were deemed to be good enough to qualify as excellent in 
most cases.

  All this is just speculation on my part, so it could be totally wrong.

  Evan

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: solsticesinger 
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 7:13 PM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins


    So, if they don't read through their scans, why aren't they put up for 
other, more careful, proofers to take care of?

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: EVAN REESE 
      To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 3:36 PM
      Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins


      Nah, they don't read through their scans. I've mentioned here before that 
there was evidence to show that they didn't, and this just adds to it.

      Evan

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: solsticesinger 
        To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 3:58 PM
        Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Comments on Impulse by Ellen Hopkins


        I just finished reading Impulse by Ellen Hopkins, which was added to 
the collection by an outsourcing group in Africa. This is one of the worst 
outsourced scans I've seen. In fact, I wonder if anyone bothered to proof it at 
all.

        The book switched point of view often, and there was no indication of 
this in the scan. Therefore, it was impossible to know which character was 
speaking at any given time. In fact, due to the lack of headers, it was 
impossible to determine how many narrators even existed.

        I saw several very common scanning errors that could have been fixed, 
if only the book had been read through. "hail" for "hall" is an example.

        I really looked forward to reading this book, but was sorely 
disappointed by the scan. It really does need to be redone, IMO.

Other related posts: