[bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:19:10 -0600
Ann, Where does it say that new members are restricted to excellent quality
books? I have never seen that.
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ann Parsons" <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 7:26 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality
submissions
Hi all,
The problem of newbies getting fair books is now moot. All new members
are automatically restricted to excellent books. this can be changed
in a person's preferences, but it is now automatic.
Ann P.
--
Ann K. Parsons
Portal Tutoring
EMAIL: akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.portaltutoring.info
"All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost."
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Jill O'Connell
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Jill O'Connell