[bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Ann Parsons <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:35:58 -0500
Hi all,
Oh, c'mon, Gary, this whole discussion which BTW, has been going on
sporatically for the past several months, was started precisely because
we want to have everyone getting the best books they can. So, that
starts with scanners. Scanners need help to scan well. Then it goes
to validators. Validators need encouragement to reject bad scans so
that they can be rescanned.
Actually, Gary, old friend, if you find a book that is of poor quality
on Bookshare, and you scan it so that you can read it, why not submit a
BSO? That way the book gets replaced, more people can read it, and you
get credit for the scan.
Ann P.
--
Ann K. Parsons
Portal Tutoring
EMAIL: akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.portaltutoring.info
"All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost."
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Grandma Cindy
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Gary Petraccaro
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Grandma Cindy
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Gary Petraccaro