[bksvol-discuss] Re: An alternative to validating fair quality submissions
- From: Grandma Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:08:53 -0800 (PST)
I think it's a good idea. It just changes the process
a bit and shortens the time involved in getting a
better copy into the collection. The present
alternative is that a validator rejects it, maybe
posts that it needs a rescan, and then someone else
may or may not rescan it and it may never get into the
collection. At the very least it would take a lot
longer.
G.Cindy
>
> So here's my alternative. If I, or any other
> scanner, obtains a copy of a
> book that is currently awaiting validation and rated
> fair, would it be
> appropriate for us to download the fair copy, reject
> it, and then upload a
> better scan of the same book?
>
>
>
> Thoughts? Ideas? No rotten tomatoes please!
>
>
>
> Donna
>
>
WISH LIST (called Requested Additions To The Bookshare Collection)is available
at
http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/Book_Requests.htm
http://www.friendsofbookshare.org/
http://studentpages.alma.edu/~07jmyate/book_requests.htm
www.jbrownell.com for miscellaneous and useful threads
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
