[bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q

  • From: "Julie Morales" <mercy421@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03:24 -0500

Some people can't afford the Bookshare subscription without the credit. I'm one 
of them. I don't do what I do specifically for the credits, but it's certainly 
a nice incentive, since I wouldn't be able to afford Bookshare without it. That 
doesn't mean I wouldn't submit, credit or not, but it certainly helps, and I'd 
imagine people validate for the same reason, especially if they're interested 
in the books. People who do it specifically for the credit are probably in the 
minority, especially for validating, since you only get 50 cents per 
validation. I was merely suggesting reasons for why some might do the bare 
minimum, but since when I do validate, which is hardly ever any more, but when 
I did, I chose books I wanted to read, anyway, so I did more than that. Take 
care.
Julie Morales
Life is a gift from God. What we do with it is our gift to Him.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: k4zq 
  To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:25 PM
  Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


  I really don't care who this offends, because I'm highly offended by a person 
who would only validate a book for their own credit!  Let me just say that a 
person of that sort has no respect for his fellow members, the books, or him or 
herself.  They are a real unmitigated drag--and I cleaned that up!

  On a completely different subject, how does one go about making his 
registration as a volunteer valid?

  I shall now validate this emale.

  Peace,
  Ernie
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Julie Morales 
    To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 3:03 PM
    Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


    Some people just want the credit and do the bare minimum to get that 
credit. I do think most, if not all, of us here are beyond that, but there are 
some validators who don't even do a spell check. That can be obvious with some 
of the books in the collection. A lot of us do want better than that, and a lot 
of us care more about the quality than the credit, but there are some things 
that would have been easy to spot if the validator would have done a little 
more than the minimum. I've seen that in some of the books I've read. Take care.
    Julie Morales
    Life is a gift from God. What we do with it is our gift to Him.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: k4zq 
      To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 7:27 AM
      Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


      Julie,

      Forgive my impertinence, but why would someone validate a book if they 
really don't care?  Seems that if one is willing to volunteer to take on that 
kind of work, it should be because they want the books on the site to be the 
best possible.

      Peace,
      Ernie
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Julie Morales 
        To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:01 PM
        Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


        Hi, Tom. I can understand what you're saying about this, but sometimes, 
if books are poorly done, really long or anything like that, it might take 
longer to get them done. Some validators are perfectionists and want their 
books to be as good as they can make them. Others just do the bare minimum and 
let it go at that. Some books would be rejected if a validator who really cared 
about that particular book couldn't keep it until it was worthy of putting up 
and as good as it could be made. This might not be an issue for some, but for 
other books, they may be rare or something that most people might not think 
about rescanning, so that book might not ever make it to the site if that 
happens. These are all just thoughts out loud and probably at least some 
reasons for why there is no limit. take care.
        Julie Morales
        Life is a gift from God. What we do with it is our gift to Him.
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: tom hawkins 
          To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
          Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 7:40 PM
          Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


          Gerald, A second thought, Has Bookshare ever decided to limet the 
number of edit renewals allowed?  It would seem that after a  reasonable 
period, the book should be returned to the step-one Q.  Tom
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Gerald Hovas 
            To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
            Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 4:17 PM
            Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Admin. Q


            Tom,

            Janice has said that it's been a bit of a mad house around there 
since back in December due to anual end of the year tasks and getting things 
backunder control since the holidays.  Once things calm down a bit I would 
imagine that Gustavo will whittle down the Awaiting Admin Approval queue.  As 
for if he ever gets to the bottom, I believe he did that two or three times 
last year and ended up sending out a message that he had nothing to approve.

            HTH

            Gerald

            -----Original Message-----
            From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of tom hawkins
            Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:54 PM
            To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
            Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Admin. Q


            Hi Everyone, been laying low for a while.  But I have a question, 
do you think Gustavo will ever get to the bottom of the administrative Q?  
Still have books sitting there from September, and my Dreamland series by Dale 
Brown has-never been found apparently, lost, "lost beneath the streets of 
Boston," their fate never to be learned, as the song goes.  The answers I get 
are vague, that the books are out being edited, since May or June?  Tom


------------------------------------------------------------------------


        No virus found in this incoming message.
        Checked by AVG Free Edition.
        Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/242 - Release Date: 
1/26/2006



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/243 - Release Date: 1/27/2006

Other related posts: