[bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls?
- From: David Larsen <dcl9934@xxxxxxx>
- To: bikeshed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:38:39 -0400
On 5/23/12 3:33 PM, Christopher Hossenlopp wrote:
Oh shit… I'm making syscalls right now too… this is gonna be a fun merge. Unless I merge the skeletons I have right now that just return FEATURE_UNIMPLEMENTED then you add your syscalls.
I can stop for now then wait for later in the day to do them, but I don't think that the merge should be /too/ bad.
In syscalls you have the same memory space as the user process. So nothing funky needs to be done.
Ok, so the page tables stay the same during a syscall? -David
- Follow-Ups:
- [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls?
- From: Christopher Hossenlopp
- [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls?
- References:
- [bikeshed] Pointer translation in syscalls?
- From: David Larsen
- [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls?
- From: Christopher Hossenlopp
- [bikeshed] Pointer translation in syscalls?
Other related posts:
- » [bikeshed] Pointer translation in syscalls? - David Larsen
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - Christopher Hossenlopp
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - David Larsen
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - Christopher Hossenlopp
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - WALTER LITWINCZYK (RIT Student)
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - David Larsen
- » [bikeshed] Re: Pointer translation in syscalls? - WALTER LITWINCZYK (RIT Student)