[biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- From: John Hudson <tiro@xxxxxxxx>
- To: biblitfonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 20:14:07 -0700
At 07:58 PM 5/2/2003, David J. Perry wrote:
I agree that splayed legs would be an additional help in differentiating
Mu and San. John, it would be helpful for me as a newcomer on the list
to have some idea of where you are with the Greek characters; is it
realistic or appropriate for us to suggest revising Mu, e.g.?
The Greek design is really just starting. I have sketched out a Latin
uppercase that will, of course, inform the Greek and share many common
letters. The Latin is a Dutch oldstyle because a) this style is highly
readable and suitable for both book and periodical publishing, b) it
combines well with my Sephardic Hebrew design, and c) I've been wanting to
design a Dutch oldstyle for a couple of years now. My aim with the Greek
lowercase is to try to develop a 'roman' (upright) design that maintains as
much of the flavour of the Byzantine cursive style as possible; the italic
will be a Byzantine cursive, related to a typeface (Clio) I began
developing for the Greek type conference in Thessaloniki last year.
We are used to seeing E/Epsilon, P/Rho,
etc. with the same shape. We see Lunate Sigma less often and so in my
mind, at least, the C with serifs is somehow not associated with a Greek
letter--it is advertising itself as a Latin form, not a Greek one, so to
speak.
On which note I have to share the attached graphic, one of my favourite
examples of multilingual 'making do'.
Thank you, David and Gerry, for your thoughts on these new characters.
Regards, John
I agree that splayed legs would be an additional help in differentiating Mu and San. John, it would be helpful for me as a newcomer on the list to have some idea of where you are with the Greek characters; is it realistic or appropriate for us to suggest revising Mu, e.g.?
We are used to seeing E/Epsilon, P/Rho, etc. with the same shape. We see Lunate Sigma less often and so in my mind, at least, the C with serifs is somehow not associated with a Greek letter--it is advertising itself as a Latin form, not a Greek one, so to speak.
Attachment:
Metropolis.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Vancouver, BC tiro@xxxxxxxx
As for the technique of trimming the nib,
Do not be greedy!
I will not reveal its nuances; I withhold its secrets.
- Ibn al-Bawwab, Ra'iyyah
- References:
- [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- From: Gerry Leonidas
- [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- From: David J. Perry
- [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
Other related posts:
- » [biblitfonts] New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- » [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- » [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- » [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- » [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0
- » [biblitfonts] Re: New Greek characters in Unicode 4.0