[beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:56:21 +0200
On 2008-06-29 at 18:33:37 [+0200], Grzegorz Dąbrowski
<grzegorz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:57:08 +0200
> Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2008-06-26 at 16:18:22 [+0200], Andreas Färber
> > <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Ingo will know more - he did some changes to APR and APR-util and
> > > created Optional Packages for them but not for neon. So likely there
> > > will have been some reason not to.
> >
> > Yep, since the neon version subversion uses is pretty obsolete, my
> > intention was to statically link it into subversion and not to create
> > an optional package for it.
>
> I'm using subversion 1.4.5 with recent neon 0.28.2 on haiku. Works fine.
I'm very sceptical wrt. using a newer neon version. They break source and
binary compatibility with every new middle version. Even if things succeed
to build, they might not work as expected.
CU, Ingo
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [beports] neon porting
- From: Salvatore Benedetto
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski
Other related posts:
- » [beports] neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- [beports] neon porting
- From: Salvatore Benedetto
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski