[beports] Re: neon porting

From: Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:44:33 +0200


Am 29.06.2008 um 18:33 schrieb Grzegorz Dąbrowski:

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:57:08 +0200
Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:


On 2008-06-26 at 16:18:22 [+0200], Andreas Färber
<andreas.faerber@xxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

Ingo will know more - he did some changes to APR and APR-util and
created Optional Packages for them but not for neon. So likely there
will have been some reason not to.


Yep, since the neon version subversion uses is pretty obsolete, my
intention was to statically link it into subversion and not to create
an optional package for it.

I'm using subversion 1.4.5 with recent neon 0.28.2 on haiku. Worksfine.


Refused to build for me last time I tried, Subversion checks for 0.25.x.

Andreas


--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:

[beports] Re: neon porting
From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski

References:
- [beports] neon porting
  - From: Salvatore Benedetto
- [beports] Re: neon porting
  - From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: neon porting
  - From: Andreas Färber
- [beports] Re: neon porting
  - From: Ingo Weinhold
- [beports] Re: neon porting
  - From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski

[beports] Re: neon porting

Other related posts: