[beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:57:08 +0200
On 2008-06-26 at 16:18:22 [+0200], Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
> Ingo will know more - he did some changes to APR and APR-util and
> created Optional Packages for them but not for neon. So likely there
> will have been some reason not to.
Yep, since the neon version subversion uses is pretty obsolete, my
intention was to statically link it into subversion and not to create an
optional package for it.
CU, Ingo
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski
- References:
- [beports] neon porting
- From: Salvatore Benedetto
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Andreas Färber
Other related posts:
- » [beports] neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- » [beports] Re: neon porting
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Grzegorz Dąbrowski
- [beports] neon porting
- From: Salvatore Benedetto
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: neon porting
- From: Andreas Färber