[beports] Re: making binary zips
- From: "Grzegorz Dąbrowski" <grzegorz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:54:41 +0200
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:39 AM, scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm trying something different to capture all of the installed files
> for things built using the GNU system. Here's what I did, first I got
> it to the point where I knew everything that is required to build the
> package, built it and tested it, then ran make clean. For my porting
> efforts I've been using the new Haiku /boot/common as my --prefix
> target. I make a new folder called say /boot/target, then use
> ./configure --prefix=/boot/target, then make, make install. Now I
> rename target to common and zip up /boot/common into a file called
> port-haiku-x.x.x.zip
> Then I delete this new common folder and rename the common-1 back to common.
> I'm guessing there's other ways to do this and only capture the files
> that should be included in a binary zip file. Anyone have other ideas
> on this?
This is very bad idea. Autotools supports DESTDIR variable. You should
build package as usual and install files to different directory, e.g.:
make install DESTDIR=~/mytmproot
and then zip all from $DESTDIR
--
Grzegorz Dąbrowski
- Follow-Ups:
- [beports] Re: making binary zips
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: making binary zips
- From: Brecht Machiels
- References:
- [beports] making binary zips
- From: scott mc
Other related posts:
- » [beports] making binary zips
- » [beports] Re: making binary zips
- » [beports] Re: making binary zips
- » [beports] Re: making binary zips
- » [beports] Re: making binary zips
- [beports] Re: making binary zips
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: making binary zips
- From: Brecht Machiels
- [beports] making binary zips
- From: scott mc