[beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: beports@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:34:36 +0200
On 2008-06-20 at 16:23:18 [+0200], scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:53 AM, scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> For the top part, I would assume this section would be:
>
> // 4. Implementation for Haiku
> #ifdef __HAIKU__
> #include <string.h> // for strerror()
> #include <os/kernel/image.h>
> #include <os/support/Errors.h>
> #define DYNAMICLOADER_DEFINED 1
I don't know the cmake code base (and don't have the time and motivation to
look into it ATM), but shouldn't there something like a generic Unix
implementation? If so, why not simply use it instead? Haiku has the dl*()
functions built-in, and although they still need some fixing, they already
are at least as good as what can be done by using the BeOS add-on API
functions.
CU, Ingo
--
BePorts homepage - http://tools.assembla.com/BePorts
List archives: http://www.freelists.org/archives/beports
Administrative contact: brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [beports] CMake round twoI'
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- From: scott mc
Other related posts:
- » [beports] CMake round twoI'
- » [beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- » [beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- » [beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- [beports] CMake round twoI'
- From: scott mc
- [beports] Re: CMake round twoI'
- From: scott mc